|
Mounds View Plann►ng Commission
<br />Regular Meeting
<br />_ _ � -_ - _
<br />April 5, 2000
<br />Page 5
<br />, s<.....
<br />Planning Associate Ericson stated in stai� s perspective, there are few adverse effectWp ��e,s�a d to
<br />this proposal. He indicated staff has not received any compuld benefit bo h�������,�"��at on and
<br />the operation of the Church, and the proposed addition wo
<br />the community. He advised that the expansion wouldt�m��C ��u� y��"��°�i����� €.��l�if there
<br />existing building and should prove to be a good addition
<br />� %:>
<br />are no other issues with regard to this request staff recom�x��nds that th� �iar�zE����; '��Y�����d'=���°�
<br />, �
<br />direct staff to draft a resolution of approval for action at the ��ext meet� g'"
<br />Planning Associate Ericson indicated that the only matter tt� A��� ��
<br />the stortnwater issue, as determined by the Rice Creek Wat������ °-
<br />resolved for another month. He exp laine d that tcon racta�,�a d�F�!rA�
<br />Buffer Permit until the Church has retained a ,,�� �val.
<br />applicant will not retain a contractor until it obtains �"xcy �� �
<br />he believed Rice Creek Watershed District would<�� 5h`��¢��' ��x�-'�?tY
<br />regarding whether or not the plans would satisf�'����-�n ��������"��r""'�`��'
<br />proposal is in order, and could be recommend�d'on fot ����� ���� a� �� r�.�
<br />;:::� �. _
<br />Chairperson Peterson opened the floc�Y�
<br />David Rudnik, 7191 Knollwo
<br />available for public inspection.
<br />the landscape plan.
<br />Mr. R�a�a�a���
<br />area. �-��� �
<br />instead o � s
<br />travel quit�
<br />utilize the r
<br />the
<br />�ti�d th�� �;
<br />,�;�; tha� �c
<br />� 9 �`h�; L�'Ey�C
<br />a �i
<br />i��resolved at thi� `���.�'��: �s
<br />fi��c;i:, and this might not be
<br />�����l�l ��t issue a Wetland
<br />���,,;�;� , � submitted. The
<br />,���,;��� x�¢��� in the interim,
<br />�;��� ,�����r, �verbal indication
<br />I-Ie indacaced staff feels the
<br />f>%:` lan was
<br />if a cop�;;�f the revised landscape p
<br />�ri����`::;;rnvided Mr. Rudnik with a copy of
<br />����e,ti ,;�e hac� ��'��,�',�1� �'o�ard an issue pertaining to traffic in the
<br />,� �,;�<� ���?,�-� s l; v o n e r s t r a v e l u p from the south, on County Road H,
<br />�� ,���A�,��,y �,oad H2, an d occasionall y on Sunday mornings, t hey
<br />�����,% ����+�E;�`�He requested that the Church ask the parishioners to
<br />,i���ca;���=: dvould like time to review the final plans, and would also
<br />,�H¢;K� process, so that he could have the opportunity to speak with
<br />���;��9�a1, in that his property is located one lot south of the
<br />u�sy:�..,Y....,---• >;.;;
<br />� - I �;:... ; .:. „
<br />. ;.
<br />��� ��%�� ry ood nei hbor, however, there have
<br />-! �,, � , j:,:�
<br />�. Rudnik stated by a�d large, the Church has been a ve g
<br />�, �;� ��ome problems ��tth a couple of the tenants who resided �ained that the e�have beenl some
<br />_. ` r�;_� ;, ���; vi�w� tk�� demolrtion to be a positive thing. He o e than one occasion, and this was
<br />on m
<br />. I' , ,
<br />ouses .
<br />;�4��,���E,,q�: �A��,�� �i� s o m e v e r b a l a b u s e a m o n g s p
<br />��,,;f� ���.�;��,a ��''be heard from inside their homes in the summ ertiOr not they intend to use new
<br />�,; ;,;>, �,��;�uire additional properties as it grows, and whet
<br />sir�gle far►vly homes for these social programs. He exp in there a shproper soc a 1 support for t e
<br />these programs, however, he would like to be certa
<br />families the Church brings in.
<br />
|