|
Mounds View Planning Commission
<br />Regular Meeting
<br />April 5, 2000
<br />Page 17
<br />Mrs. Brunes stated she did not wish to continue to fight with Justin, and never did. She explained
<br />�,:.>.<,.
<br />that she had simply requested he do the right thing. She stated the Police receive many;c;,��t1�,ls, and
<br />they always come and they have treated her very well, however, it seems tr�2e. �1��y ar� �nable to
<br />do anything with Justin such as arrest him for calling her obscene words �P�r k��aNq���d out that
<br />she has even held the telephone outside her window at 4 30 ���the mor�:����; ����s. �� a. �:r�e Police
<br />listen to the comments he makes. �' '����
<br />Chairperson Peterson advised that the Planning Comriri�.
<br />action that could be taken from a planning standpoint. i'
<br />with regard to Police enforcement. He stated the City' �
<br />these issues, and it appears that there has been some enfor
<br />Mrs. Brunes stated this process has taken three years,
<br />another one starts. __
<br />Chairperson Peterson stated both of these
<br />diligently, and the Police Department must fi��
<br />,� R:
<br />Mrs. Brunes indicated they had spent
<br />put in on bad advice, and she felt th�
<br />,� ::<
<br />reiterated no one ever advised t�'�n
<br /><,,;�,;�
<br />backyard. �`�
<br />�r::;:.�
<br />1�11J. I�-Y3UJ.A�r�: k ��(�A��/Vl� Snfd
<br />time iri ���;� � r���., i:-�� 2
<br />backyard.� ��
<br />Commissio��� .�°� ���
<br />,. . ' �
<br />Commi�tnri'cai�lc� �3,,?�
<br />i f>F..
<br />would hope Mrs. �ru��
<br />� ��
<br />to ���erse the Plannin
<br />�, :�
<br />��a����.�rl not be in favor �
<br />; �.�k�x»�er, he did not de
<br />to
<br />ivas to
<br />as :�
<br />/x f ��
<br />CtSriSidei- iz c�,���'� ���� �,��;�°
<br />y;s
<br />:here were ce���������t,� �� ;���"'�
<br />�c�� could addre�� :��.�yc� �i
<br />, ��a�-d.
<br />� a�����' �l�an up one mess,
<br />s��o�����'''�e followed very
<br />�kz�� situation.
<br />�t�''a tree r<;������r;a� iri order to have the fence
<br />;tims all t.�� way around in this regard. She
<br />only ca:,txst"ruct and eight-foot fence in the
<br />.�� ;��� ���-�. g���� ����, ��s��ning to install a fence in the backyard.
<br />���,; ��;�� indicatei� ���e' �i���ers her front yard, and has invested much
<br />a�F�, ��.�u'r,��-�'� two dogs attack the fence every time she goes into the
<br />a t�, , E,�;�l �-�� ;���� for the applicant, however, he did not see how the
<br />�$fl�;� *,���i�rnce, in light of the factors that must be addressed. He stated he
<br />:� ��-������, � Lpeat her statements to the City Council, which has the authority
<br />�;!;�*��ssion's decision, and could possibly help her. He indicated he
<br />�`.:��itt�� a precedent in allowing an eight-foot fence in front of any house,
<br />;,
<br />�� to see the Brunes continue to suffer either.
<br />i; �,
<br />�` ��a,�ar����ior�ez- ������id stated this appeared to be a terrible situation to deal with, and he had
<br />g����F��,' £�,�F��:�!} ���:�?"Iv1rs. Brunes. He stated that if the City has not been able to help her resolve
<br />�;�,, ��; �,��� ;,�� �� i:hree years, they have a problem as a City. He stated the City has a responsibility
<br />�� {��,' �,�,_���1�fli1g about this, and if it cannot assist, this in itself creates an unusual circumstance.
<br />�3[e su�gested a possible means to address this would be to approve the fence as a temporary
<br />structure until something could be done to resolve these problems. He pointed out that the
<br />structure the applicant was proposing appeared to be somewhat temporary in nature, and if the
<br />problems were resolved, she would likely be willing to remove it.
<br />
|