Laserfiche WebLink
� f - � <br />�i/ " " ' <br />�� <br />Mounds View Planning Commission <br />Regular Meeting <br />�; -_ <br />�� / //f .�. ll,Vi <br />.. .. .. � �'- '- . .. " <br />April 5, 2000 <br />Page 18 <br />Mrs. Brunes stated this was correct. She reiterated she has a beautiful hedge that goes all the way <br />�<,. <br />aroun er property, and she removed a 32 year-old tree she had planted in order to it��11 this <br />fence. .; `'_.��°� <br />Chairperson Peterson stated this appeared to be an issue of <br />she has filed a civil suit against Justin for doing this to her. S <br />she must go through the proper channels in this regard, at� <br />what to do with Justin. F<'«>. <br />Chairperson Peterson stated the Police Department shoul <br />provide relief from this situation, and the City Council rru <br />that the Planning Commission was required to examine <br />Code and State Statutes, and it does not have the freed+ <br />accordingly. He explained that from a land-plannir��; G.�� <br />although the applicant clearly does have a problerp <���� �, � <br />would not allow the Commission to approve this r�q��u�� ; <br />Commissioner Berke advised that the <br />cases when an applicant wishes to a� <br />variances. ,�� <br />Mrs. Brunes inquired <br />explained that if the � <br />appeal to ��E� �:i.cy Cou� <br />�' the Pla�ng C <br />��; � <br /><.� <br />�� <br />j <br />sh� ti�=r���c� proc�� <br />�o �, <br />point, <br />nent i.��d�.'�,�, ������:Py �ndicated <br />;d she 1na:K ��a' :�� :�=����3.�rie�.� that <br />theysdc� ��c�� �F���:�,,�' �ss �:.�aow <br />Q:c� cleternune some �.xg��.��;�'�o <br />� �'�„� �.n.itz�te this. He advised <br />�����s ^ ;, �� terms of the City <br />=�s ������'��;>,?1 �anless it is done <br />» `���x�°� '���( f��e a hardship, <br />l�e ���.���� t���i �he City Code <br />:�`° ��lanning Commission in <br />:� ��ecision with regard to <br />with this. Chairperson Peterson <br />st, Mrs. Brunes has the option to <br />Comrriisc�F�,�>f;�. rA,y.,h� r : :, , <br />.�t�ie�..�a� ��� ��f�� �ry �h� applicant s house and has seen the property. He <br />stated it ��s�� %xf�a�� ���; �� ��_arn tli"a.B: ���a;� ��, °� ��sue of harassment. He stated he sympathized with the <br />applicant, h��vp��,� �����,������;r� ���,, ��������,�� �o through the same situation for several years. He <br />indicated rt�tc>;q� s�x�. e�<fi�E ��;'>�ir e�n���xr�� ����t'ime to resolve this, and these residents ultimately had to <br />approa,k��3�us s�tua�i�-� ��� �s �x�x ��-a�r that made the entire neighborhood angry, <br />,,�'� `<�: <br />F%;r ; ,<_ <br />M� Brunes stated sh� c�^.;; ���;���pted to gain the support of the residents along Groveland Road, <br />�y of whom she has�;�ow�ii for 30 years. She explained that every weekend the residents are <br />s :: y; � 2 <br />t�i�� in their yards pickin�=up the trash, and the neighbor across the street has had to call the Police <br />��� ��;��1 times as well,..��wever, they are afraid to become involved. <br />.'�� <br />�::..... <br />� <br />'--`- �Mry� FR��a+�r ��;� 1�Iapment Director Jopke suggested that one approach might be to investigate the <br />a��_ ���� �`.��� �� =a��proving this itern through the interim use permit process. He indicated staff <br />�J� e�< ����`v� i:c� ���scuss this with the City Attorney. He explained that the City could issue such a <br />permit for a finite period of time, however, it would not be possible to proceed through the <br />variance process. <br />f <br />4 <br />� _ /� .•/% <br />