2000 Planning Commission Packets

Home Browse Search

E _ � j � . . � Y� �+ � - � Mounds View Planning Commission Regular Meeting � . � � __ . . " �� f>�'� �Y � S � - - Y A..r- _ - . __. -��-s=--_ ._ "- (�.::- Apri15, 2000 Page 25 the parking lot. He explained that this was the only p ossible location for the sign, as it could not g o into the pond, and if it were located on the other side of t�e uo e�, n� ould be too close to the second proposed sign to meet the 500-foot MnD�T spacmg q Commissioner Laube inquired if the applicant has submi�e dat the Sys go si e�on Mondayt and Planning Associate Ericson stated he met with Mr. Radama the are working toward this. He explained that the Planniega desi�n Sproposal t o p esent fog Y action on this matter, however, the applicant should a consideration at the ne� meeting, and they are both confident that this will be resolved to the satisfaction of both parties. Commissioner Kaden requested clarification regarding t�nhal�d� h a d Pts clo e prox lmit Et c the stated part of the hardslup ls the location of the par g � ro ert line. He explained that the City is imposing design ne�nthe efohet he sign ouldthave p p Y traffic, which would be overly burdensome to the property o�' ' i� that the sign could not be to be located off of the parking lose aration e He stated staff interprets a hardship to be present located to maintain the 1,000-foot p in terms of the location of the City's billboard on thafBhasgforwarded the c�rit ria tol heSCity potential locations of the Sysco signs. He mdicated st Attorne s for their review, and believes these findings address the apparent hardships in this Y situation. Commissioner Hegland stated in his opinion, this was a stretch for a hardship. He stated he understood the reasoning behind this, however, he would ma'arties that the real issue should have been resolved with a setback from the property line for both p Chairperson Peterson stated the Commission could not�i ectiont egard ngbthe p eparationaof a public hearing. He inquire d i f s t a ff w a s r e q u e s t m g resolution. lannin Associate Ericson explained that if the Planning CommiS th re eard to he hardship, staff P S criteria and the manner in W��hose�cr teria and responses asep esented n the staff report. would draft a resolution usmg It was the general consensus of the Commission to direct staff to proceed. uncil Liaison Marty stated he realized that the billboard Precause of he truck t ai�ic on the Co p y e construction, b parking lot required to be of a mono ole t p He in uired i£ the Planning Commission had considered the�mo t n� wlth the b llboardston srte. 9 in order that it is more c second billboard on the Sysco property, the City property. ' erson Peterson stated the Commission has discussed this �a �ea o he Ci yr Counc 1 Chatrp monument style design. He explamed that the language they