Laserfiche WebLink
_ <br />�= - � _ .� F� _ <br />- - - - � — - <br />Mounds View Planning Commission <br />Regular Meeting <br />April 5, 2000 <br />Page 26 <br />c _ .� - - <br />indicated that the billboards should be aesthetically complementary to the City's billboards. He <br />stated there was also discussion regarding a brick facing on the pole structure, however, he was <br />uncertain if there was any specific language pertaining to the design of the second billboard on the <br />Sysco property. <br />Planning Associate Ericson stated the resolution recommending approval of the two Sysco <br />billboards contains a clause which indicates that the billboards be aesthetically complementary to <br />the signs on the golf course, and does not differentiate between one sign and the other. <br />Commissioner Stevenson indicated the design style was somewhat unclear at this point, therefore, <br />the Commission had requested the applicant come back before them with their proposal for <br />further consideration of the design. Chairperson Peterson pointed out that the Council would <br />make the final determination in terms of the type of construction. <br />Planning Associate Ericson stated this was correct. He indicated the Council heard the interim <br />use permit request for the Sysco billboards, and this item was tabled. He stated the City's interim <br />use permit for billboards at the golf course was approved, however, that approval would not take <br />effect until sozne time in May, when Ordinances 655, 656, and 657 become ef%ctive, He <br />explained that the interim use permit for the Sysco billboards was tabled pending resolution of the <br />variance request, and it would also be subject to the effective date of the ordinances, which would <br />not occur until 30 days after publication, therefore, the delay would not be detrimental. He <br />indicated Sysco's interim use permit request would be on the April 24 Council Agenda, and it is <br />hoped that at that time, there will be a design proposal in place that would meet with Council <br />approval. <br />Council Liaison Marty extended his thanks to all of the Commission members. He stated he has <br />reviewed all of the information the Commission has forwarded on to the Council, and feels that <br />they are doing an excellent job. He added that the recommendations that come to the Council <br />appear to be examined from every aspect and perspective. He indicated he has expressed these <br />sentiments at the Council Meetings, however, he would like to reiterate his appreciation at this <br />time. <br />Chairperson Peterson thanked Council Liaison Marty for his comments. He stated the Planning <br />Commission attempts to prevent problems at the Council level if possible, and hopefully, the <br />information they provide is usable. <br />9� Staff Reports / Items of Information <br />A• Previous City Council Action <br />Community Development Director Jopke updated the Commission regarding recent Council <br />action. He stated on Monday March 27, the Council adopted Ordinances 655, 656, and 657, <br />which have since been published. He explained that Ordinance 655 pertains to the rezoning of the <br />golf course parcels from CRP and I-1 to PF. He stated Ordinance 657 creates the new Chapter <br />