|
_ __ - - -"
<br />Mounds View Planning Commission January 5, 2000
<br />Regular Meeting Page 15
<br />during the next several weeks, and if this can be accomplished in a lesser
<br />would certainly attempt to do so.
<br />,«,.
<br />Commissioner Johnson advised that they could postpone
<br />there was substantial input at the formal public hearing on F
<br />there would be no need to delay the matter.
<br />Planning Associate Ericson stated he would inform
<br />this regard.
<br />Commissioner Kaden inquired if there would be some
<br />those located along Highway 10, where the zoning
<br />property adjacent to it.
<br />Planning Associate Ericson advised the Com�r�hensi
<br />of property. He explained that there might,,be �a redist
<br />however, this would not require a rezoni�g�at this poii
<br />Chairperson Peterson indicated
<br />notification, it would be wise tc
<br />differenc� bPtw�en the Com�r�l�
<br />could po�����:��lly occur ir► s.�s� �m,s��:
<br />��
<br />Chairperson �'`�4.z�x ���
<br />do somethiri� �; � � x��
<br />occur, �(t�=�nly �y
<br />�„»>
<br />residerits�'affected.
<br />�io�
<br />ter for a�t�i��}:, g��rt�>.
<br />9, how��-.-;�, F�'�&z�Y��,
<br />,;::,<,.
<br />;�ielopment Director
<br />e�t
<br />me, staff
<br />weelcs if
<br />��re not,
<br />:3�as����>� i«
<br />ers, particularly
<br />�ronertv or the
<br />iplate any rezoning
<br />of some properties,
<br />here ma}�'`r:�iot be a legal requirement for
<br />who m�'�<'be affected, in order to clarify the
<br />a�r��r�.,�,rid the actual zoning, as well as what
<br />there vvas already some confusion in this regard.
<br />ined ti3t�� i���' �'���dents should be aware that the City does not intend to
<br />�xplaine�� �tli��' ihis is planned process, whereby if something were to
<br />��€�`-�;�,�, tih� results would be beneficial for both the City, and the
<br />nissioner Johnson, poiri�ed out that this information would be for the benefit of the
<br />��
<br />wners along Hig�t?s�ay 10, who might have concerns that the City desires to take their
<br />'al� land, which,Xl��y have owned for many years. Commissioner Kaden added that these are
<br />:.,�,
<br />coneerns, in tkit�;��this has occurred in other cities.
<br />u;'�����?.��������,z� �egland advised that there was no reason for citizens to fear this, however, the
<br />�J'��,�,r ;���a��r� �;larify that this is not the intent of the Comprehensive Plan, but rather, it is a plan for
<br />iutur� d�vetopment, if future development is to occur. He explained that it does not alter any
<br />existing property rights, and this should be communicated.
<br />Chairperson Peterson inquired if the decision to schedule the Informational Corrununity Forum or
<br />the formal public hearing, or both, would be determined during the next two Study Sessions.
<br />
|