My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2000 Planning Commission Packets
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2000
>
2000 Planning Commission Packets
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/11/2021 1:10:53 PM
Creation date
3/5/2012 3:44:55 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
1197
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
, <br />: _ ,. _ <br />� �_ ,__� � . , <br />�---------- - =_--- - � �,�. :; _ , -- �..:- -- <br />_ --------- , <br />-- ---- --�- �°------- - ._,. . . . --- =_ - � <br />Mounds View Planning Commission <br />Regular Meeting <br />January 5, 2000 <br />Page 16 <br />Corrunissioner Johnson pointed out that the public hearing would req <br />notification. Commissioner Kaden inquired if a 60-day notice was required <br />xired, which Y;` <br />ed to the rie�vz <br />Planning Associate Ericson explained that a 10-day notice is <br />days prior to the meeting, and the information must be pr� <br />publication date. � <br />Commissioner Johnson suggested two 20-day notices be p <br />Planning Associate Ericson stated staff would probably <br />aware and prepared. He indicated that staff would alsc <br />website, it would be scrolled on Channel 16, and any othe <br />will be utilized. <br />Chairperson Peterson inquired if the Focus:,�i?vas still ili <br />Associate Ericson stated this was correct. :.° �' <br />Chairperson Peterson noted that <br />advertised in both the Focus and th <br />would consider this as well. ,.� <br />Chairp�s s� <br />the Ca���� <br />!�o <br />Planning <br />son sta���� z�, 3�F�� the con <br />e Plan ���d� .���si,ons for <br />°���en� C�'�a�unv�°�1. �'�,ccir.���,�� <br />�g the Plannia�� <br />held the first r� <br />nd reading has <br />; could possib] <br />;<. <br />have been prc�� <br />e t�:�<;��Iow for <br /><::z, <br />�ublic hearing. <br />10 <br />the <br />��� i�z5���-� ti}��.� the residents are <br />�l�j�;� �����s� � r�a �ion on the City's <br />'r,hai; �,�� �v��l��l�; for advertising <br />cial.�ewspaper. Planning <br />Criformationa� Community Forum had been <br />apers. Pls:�ning Associate Ericson stated staff <br />;> �:>< <br />,.y;, <br />�'t��e Planning Commission to set the dates of <br />12 and 26, 2000. <br />���:�. si:ac�c� �� <:�s:he December 13 City Council meeting, the Council <br />�� ����s; ;��f �ni� ax�►d development review for Sunrise Methodist Church, <br />�t�i����;���c�n's recommendation, with no changes. He indicated that the <br />diri',� ��'�)rdinance 642, pertaining to driveway widths and curb cuts, and <br />�P�� ;��:?r��;3duled to occur on December 10. He explained that one of the <br />change, and this has not yet been determined, however, no substantial <br />sed to this ordinance, which the Planning Commission recommended. <br />���.���z�A,�;.1��sc�,���e 'Ericson stated the Council held second reading and adoption of Ordinance <br />��-f�, ���•1;{.���a��;�illboards. He indicated there was consideration of a request for a Wetland Buffer <br />�f'��'..c���� �tah the property located at 2551 Ridge Lane, and this item was tabled for further <br />c�i�c�ssio�i. He indicated that the Council discussed this item at their previous Work Session, and <br />it has been scheduled for consideration on January 10. <br />Planning Associate Ericson advised that the City had authorized staff to draft a resolution which <br />would allow TOLD Development Company to come forward with an application and <br />development proposal for the City remnant parcel and the Midland/Videen parcel. He advised <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.