Laserfiche WebLink
. . . � _ .. _ _ .. . _ . . . . .. .. <br />Mounds View Planning Commission <br />Regular Meeting <br />'_'" "- '-_ ' .. '._" ��.'_""�" �. _ _ . �. . �_, : ._�_ .'_�.. "'_ <br />January 5, 2000 <br />Page 17 <br />that the City is required to sign off on the application, as the City is one of <br />therefore, the Council directed staff to draft a resolution authorizing the �:i <br />development application. He explained that this does not �ta�antee �lz� <br />approved, but simply allows a proposal to come forth, and tkzi�'proposal w� <br />Planning Commission. ;�� ��� <br />Chairperson Peterson inquired if the additionai cost for <br />the City property had been authorized. <br />Plar�ning Associate Ericson stated this issue was discussed, c���c� <br />with the developer, who will probably bear the majonty, ��'raoc a1 <br />and platting. He advised that this matter could be clai-ii��d i�i the <br />Council at their next meeting. <br />B. Upcoming Planning Cases <br />Planning Associate Ericson stated at <br />be consideration a variance request p <br />Highway 8. He explained that a sux� <br />slightly over the minimum setbacl� F� <br />to allow the building to rPm�ir� �'i <br />owner�h��, <br />explaine�l ���F�� �x i;�' � <br />prospective o�v�x���4s °��� <br />location of i�a�; ��i�����;�:���' <br />,��� <br />�:; ;:°,, <br />Comr��sioner Heglan� <br />�>. ;, <br />of.e�'sting property is <br />�::;,,, <br />/��>'. <br />��� <br />�1`�nning Associate Eri <br />,:>-;;> <br />'+��alained that the Cit� <br />pr�f�a- <br />the <br />re on that <br />would be <br />�efore the ,�_`;;,:� <br /><�,� y; <br />;,;�;. <br />:�.::: �1� Yy. <br />i�IXIFDn�l14i bJ% ����.�• <br />��rr�ent has been made <br />r� ��.;� � or the surveying <br />��� ��i�ta�:, �oes before the <br />ne �ext meeti»g of thP ����r�gY�� Commission, there would <br />, <br />_ �;. <br />�a�tiing to a'�varehous�/c��'�ice building, which is located on <br />,r,. <br />, ,. <br />y>'of the prt�perty has �ndicated that the building is situate <br />the paz�r;��, iil�i-efore� �Iie applicant is requesting a variance <br />curren�I� ��.�ts, sirnply to provide for a clean transfer of <br />a va.riance was required. Planning Associate Ericson <br />r�,4�r�.i-red, however, many times mortgage companies or <br />;�;`a��t approval in writing, in order to legitimize the existing <br />� is an e�sting property clause, which indicates that the status <br />1�y a transfer of ownership. <br />� pointed out that potential legal problems could arise in the future. He <br />not request this application, however, the applicant chose to proceed in <br />������ ,�<<��; F�°�;:�c��iate Ericson stated pursuant to the discussion at the previous Council Work <br />;�'� ^� �cx��;; ��l �iublic meetings held in City Hall shall be subject to cable cast. He explained that the <br />�°l�x�riing Commission Agenda Sessions, at which meeting minutes and other non-planning related <br />issues are reviewed, and the special meetings, such as those held for the review of the <br />Comprehensive Plan would be televised from that point forward. <br />Planning Associate Ericson advised that since the Planning Commission is required to review the <br />Bylaws during their first meeting in February, they could amend the Bylaws to reflect this new <br />