My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2000 Planning Commission Packets
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2000
>
2000 Planning Commission Packets
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/11/2021 1:10:53 PM
Creation date
3/5/2012 3:44:55 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
1197
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
__ _ _ <br />Mounds View Planning Commission <br />Regular Meeting <br />3. <br />Citizens' Requests and Comments on Items Not on the Agend <br />There were no citizen requests or comments on items not on <br />4. Approval of Minutes <br />A. December 1, 1999 <br />B. November 17, 1999 <br />MOTION/SECOND: Stevenson/Miller to approve the <br />1999 meeting minutes, as corrected. __ <br />Ayes — 8 <br />5. Planning Case No. 578-99 <br />Property Involved: 2442 Laport Di� <br />Consideration of a variance requ�5 <br />� located �t �.�!!;�. �,aport I7x-i�r�� <br />Applic�t�i `��:�����;er Mist�l�lc� <br />The applicar�i: <br />�plicant, Spenc��� l�� <br />� construction of ;� <br />�::« <br />d in an unimpro�%�:� <br />;.:.�� <br />A 30-foot setl�ac <br />�treet, and,,t;k��::-�.pp] <br />���. <br />for a red���` <br />T <br />January 19, 2000 <br />Page 2 <br />da. <br />1, 1'�-,���' 8� <br />November 17, <br />n carried. <br />setback for the proposed home to be <br />r� ���rrc;,the staff report as follows: <br />�������, is requesting a variance for a reduced sideyard setback to allow <br />h'ho�`rie on his property at 2442 Laport Drive. The subject property is <br />area, just off of Woodlawn Drive, and is adjacent to unimproved Faber <br />is required because one side of the subject property abuts unimproved <br />cant is seeking a 10-foot sideyard setback. <br />�l���r.��.i�; l, ���ciate Ericson stated there was significant discussion at the last regular meeting of <br />�t�i� �'�K �a�rr�?�Q �ommission regarding this item, however, there has been no resolution as to how the <br />matter should proceed. He explained that staff has attempted to maintain contact with the <br />applicant, who is examining his options at this point, and further information should be available <br />by the end of the week. <br />Planning Associate Ericson explained that the time frame for consideration of this item provides <br />that the Planning Commission is not required to take action at this time, therefore, staff would <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.