2000 Planning Commission Packets

Home Browse Search

_ Mounds View Planning Commission Regular Meeting -- I �_ ______ _____ — - �- � -- - - --�- — - -- � January 19, 2000 Page 3 recommend the item be tabled until the February Z, 2000 meeting of the Pla�i; He indicated that if no word is received from the applicant by that meeting ��9.� resolution to deny the request. He noted that the applicant rru�h�t also wita��r�� or request Planning Commission action, however, this is still und�iermined. Commissioner Miller inquired if the applicant could request a�t' extensi Planning Associate Ericson stated this was correct. He ex�>��t�� '� could also extend the matter for an additional 60 days, witho�� ;c��, accidentally, by virtue of non-action on the part of the City �� {�k✓�.; to act upon all planning requests within 60 days, unless t�at �+�A.r; Commission could extend this matter for an addition�l 60 days. ' information regarding how this matter will proceec� sk�c��.�l� t��. �?v�ilable MOTION/SECOND: Stevenson/Kaden. To Ta�'ie 1'1 2, 2000 Meeting of the Planning Commissio:Ci Y� Ayes — ..,..�.. .:. 8 '�' �� N . 6. Planning Case No. ; Proper��r x�� wf`��f��?: 4749 �ltl Consici�h��;� �s�'�`�:esolutioti buildin� io�,��< �. �r. �i`i�;9 Olcl Applicant: ��:� ��•<s�a��es, The .ai�plicant was not iiinission. ill draft a plication, the Planning Corrr��;:,�i�n th�t it might be approved � ��at the City is required �rr�e: �:>� �j�tended, and the ��; �R�g��ed that further y ��«, <��r� of the week. 5?,�r99 Until the February The motion carried. ��1ay 8 Ct(�, �s xesolution approving a front-yard setback variance for the Associate Erics�n gave the staff report as follows: ��_ item is a requ��ti< for a variance to allow for a reduced front yard setback for an o ice- ,.; .<,. �ouse buildin `;;lbcated at 4749 Old Highway 8. The applicant, ASC Properties, LLC is the �;, �9�r�� ;Y� cy �h�; subject property, which is in the process of changing hands. An application for �E ��;��`�>� en requested in order to provide for a clean transfer of the property. Planning Associate Ericson advised that a variance is required because the building, according to a recent survey, encroaches into the front yard setback by approximately 2 to 3 feet, on the north end of the property. He noted that the property curves slightly, therefore, the building maintains the required 40-foot setback toward the south end of the property.