My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2000 Planning Commission Packets
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2000
>
2000 Planning Commission Packets
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/11/2021 1:10:53 PM
Creation date
3/5/2012 3:44:55 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
1197
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
. <br />Mounds View Planning Commission <br />Regular Meeting <br />January 19, 2000 <br />Page 4 <br />Planning Associate Ericson stated staff believes a hardship exists in this case, a� that <br />owner, who is purchasing the property, was not involved in the constructioz�' c��'�he'. <br />added that the construction of the structure at the 37-foot setback;..was no� ���i:���ic�: <br />likely, the result of an error at the time the site was improved , <br />Planning Associate Ericson stated staff has drafted Resoliition 60 <br />variance request, and would allow the established setback t��° �7.33 fee <br />any variance approval, there is a stipulation that the resol��.�i��� ����,i� <br />County. He advised that another stipulation indicates that ��e�. ���r�:rt����� <br />as shown on the survey on file with the Community Develo����:��.��b �:y��� <br />stipulation provides that the reduced setback will only apply"to �h�� ��� <br />setback, and does not allow a 37-foot setback for the entire. buildin�. ` <br />Chairperson Peterson inquired if there <br />reconstruction of Old Highway 8, a few ye <br />believe any changes were made at that time <br />Chairperson Peterson noted this � <br />Planning Associate Ericson stated il�i <br />MOTION/SECOND: Johnson/I,aut <br />Resolutiox� �°'.I�. 603-00, a. ��,�1�i�sr��n <br />MoundS �I��:d�,� �oning ��z�it� �=�t�� ��irai <br />for an `��.���ir�� ��ce-��:4��T.�c�����; <br />Planning �`��ta .I'�t�, ��79-�99. <br />,t';�res — II <br />�`<��� i� <br />7. ��;`Annual reve� <br />8. <br />ding. He <br />but most <br /><�' <br />.<_ _'; <br />� ��1, which !'��p�a�€��r�., �:1�.c <br />:�He explained ���,�'��� ��ii;�� ., <br />be recorded with ��' ���sey <br />�1 reduced setbacic �iaall be <br />�� „+ar.:nt. He explained this <br />�. t����: �xceeds the 40-foot <br />ihe �-igi�� :;€�f way during the <br />c;iate Ericson stated he did not <br />existed for the last 22 years. <br />�e. To' .�_��?b;��r� ,�ounds View Planning Commission <br />Approv�zi�� �� '41Axr,�nce from Section 1104.01, Subd. 4, of the <br />ng to ��tb7r��c�"io A,llow for a Reduced Front Yard Setback <br />�'huilding Located at 4749 Old Highway 8, Mounds View <br />ays — 0 The motion carried. <br />; Associate Ericstir� ��ated staff would request the Planning Commission postpone the <br />of the Bylaws ,t�r�iil their next meeting. He explained that according to the Bylaws, this <br />is supposed,`;tts' occur during the first meeting in February, however, this item was <br />:ently placed'�;on the agenda at this time. He indicated that staff would include a copy of <br />;��,�� �s�;Ch� ��ommissioners' packets in order to provide sufficient time for review prior to <br />� <br />Staff Reports / Items of Information <br />A. Previous Council Elctions (1/10/00) <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.