My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Resolution 4187
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Resolutions
>
04000 - 04499 (1990-1994)
>
Resolution 4187
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/25/2019 10:16:17 AM
Creation date
1/30/2007 3:20:40 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV City Council
City Council Document Type
Resolutions
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
252
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
d.:: _. -==- -- -. : L _..--- _----. . .. .:s..: =_..:t - --=-L=^-----... =::.s. <br />residents; it was a negative for support among over 65 year olds. <br />Thirty-nine percent were more apt to support the proposal far new <br />construction given that City Hall does not meet current state and <br />federal standards for handicapped accessibility. Less than two <br />year and 11-20 year residents were positively impacted by this <br />observation. <br />Other arguments were somewhat less persuasive. Twenty-eight <br />percent were more favorably moved when told the current police <br />facilities does not have interrogation room, and suspects and <br />victims cannot be properly separated during questioning. Less <br />than five year residents, 18-24 year olds, and Precinct 2 resi- <br />dents were more likely to be supportive in this case. Twenty- <br />three percent were more apt to be much more supportive when <br />informed the heating system in City Hall is faulty and not eco- <br />nomically efficient to operate; twenty-one percent were similarly <br />motivated whe,n told the City Hall has insufficient space to <br />adequately meet the growing public demand for services and meet- <br />ing space. The latter argument favorably impacted less than two <br />year residents and 25-34 year olds. Clearly, the two key argu- <br />ments in favor of the new facilities would be privacy and handi- <br />capped accessibility. <br />A fifty percent majority would be willing to see their <br />property taxes increased by $20°00 yearly to fund the construc- <br />tion of a new Police Department Building and related City Hall <br />improvements.: But, thirty percent of the residents reported they <br />were willing;to pay "nothing" and twenty-one percent were unsure <br />about their willingness to pay; 45-54 year olds and Precinct One <br />residents were most likely to fall into the former group. Any <br />bond issue raising the average yearly property tax above $20.00 <br />would require a highly aggressive campaign to assure passage. <br />A dead heat resulted in reaction to a specific construction <br />proposale Farty-four percent were willing to support a 2.1 <br />million dollar Police Department Building and related City Hall <br />improvements package; but, forty-five percent opposed it. Strong <br />opponents outnumbered strong supporters by two-to-one. Precinct <br />4 residents and less than two year residents were most likely ta <br />be supportive; over ten year residents and over 45 year olds were <br />much more likely to be "strongly opposed." Under these circum- <br />stances, the chances of passing a referendum this large would <br />seem remote. <br />The inclusion of a community meeting room in a building <br />package would have a negative impact. Only twenty-fiv percent <br />were more likely to support the package with this addition; but, <br />thirty-eight percent stated they were less likely to do soo 3-10 <br />year residents and men were mvre likely to support a bond issue <br />with this inclusion. Over 45 year olds and Precinct 3 residents <br />were much less likely to do soe In this already hostile elector- <br />al environment, a larger scale project including a community room <br />would not aid in the passage of the proposal. <br />2
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.