Laserfiche WebLink
d.:: _. -==- -- -. : L _..--- _----. . .. .:s..: =_..:t - --=-L=^-----... =::.s. <br />residents; it was a negative for support among over 65 year olds. <br />Thirty-nine percent were more apt to support the proposal far new <br />construction given that City Hall does not meet current state and <br />federal standards for handicapped accessibility. Less than two <br />year and 11-20 year residents were positively impacted by this <br />observation. <br />Other arguments were somewhat less persuasive. Twenty-eight <br />percent were more favorably moved when told the current police <br />facilities does not have interrogation room, and suspects and <br />victims cannot be properly separated during questioning. Less <br />than five year residents, 18-24 year olds, and Precinct 2 resi- <br />dents were more likely to be supportive in this case. Twenty- <br />three percent were more apt to be much more supportive when <br />informed the heating system in City Hall is faulty and not eco- <br />nomically efficient to operate; twenty-one percent were similarly <br />motivated whe,n told the City Hall has insufficient space to <br />adequately meet the growing public demand for services and meet- <br />ing space. The latter argument favorably impacted less than two <br />year residents and 25-34 year olds. Clearly, the two key argu- <br />ments in favor of the new facilities would be privacy and handi- <br />capped accessibility. <br />A fifty percent majority would be willing to see their <br />property taxes increased by $20°00 yearly to fund the construc- <br />tion of a new Police Department Building and related City Hall <br />improvements.: But, thirty percent of the residents reported they <br />were willing;to pay "nothing" and twenty-one percent were unsure <br />about their willingness to pay; 45-54 year olds and Precinct One <br />residents were most likely to fall into the former group. Any <br />bond issue raising the average yearly property tax above $20.00 <br />would require a highly aggressive campaign to assure passage. <br />A dead heat resulted in reaction to a specific construction <br />proposale Farty-four percent were willing to support a 2.1 <br />million dollar Police Department Building and related City Hall <br />improvements package; but, forty-five percent opposed it. Strong <br />opponents outnumbered strong supporters by two-to-one. Precinct <br />4 residents and less than two year residents were most likely ta <br />be supportive; over ten year residents and over 45 year olds were <br />much more likely to be "strongly opposed." Under these circum- <br />stances, the chances of passing a referendum this large would <br />seem remote. <br />The inclusion of a community meeting room in a building <br />package would have a negative impact. Only twenty-fiv percent <br />were more likely to support the package with this addition; but, <br />thirty-eight percent stated they were less likely to do soo 3-10 <br />year residents and men were mvre likely to support a bond issue <br />with this inclusion. Over 45 year olds and Precinct 3 residents <br />were much less likely to do soe In this already hostile elector- <br />al environment, a larger scale project including a community room <br />would not aid in the passage of the proposal. <br />2