Laserfiche WebLink
TRANSPORTATION � <br />1)6 T/10/:7 .. � � <br />31 "AASHTO Guids tor Bicycle Routea." <br />Implamsntinp agencisa that intend to build bicy- <br />cle end Dadahkn 6ridya ehould alao be aware <br />o} Federal Hiphway Administretion repuletions. <br />Foi ezample, thess repulationa requirs ramps <br />rathsr than stepa on thoae bridges conseruc[ed <br />witM1 federal hiphway funda. <br />FUNDING PRIORITIES <br />The following panerol priorities shoulC be con- <br />sidereA in funtlin0 of bieycle and pedestrian <br />fadlitlee in addition to any criteria or restrictions <br />attBehW to funds by the prenting agency. It is <br />recognized that not all Orol�v Pmposed for <br />funding will fulfill all tha following priorities, but <br />a D�olect which fulfills even one should be niven <br />prioriry ova� projeats which fulfill nona. <br />Funding Driority should be given to <br />fatilities lotated in the corridors shown on <br />the MetroOOlitan System Plan map which <br />ere in eccordence with the other policias at <br />this plan. <br />2. Fundinp prioriry should be piven to the <br />furtdinp of structures which remove <br />physical barrisrs ta bicycle and pedeserian <br />movemant. Howevx, whera O�ible, <br />cidewalka of edpuate width, lanas, or <br />�eparan paGu on exiating bridgea should <br />bs usad fa bicyde and pedastrian systems <br />fnstsad of new faeilities constructed e�� <br />dusively for these systeme. <br />3. Funding prioriry ahould be given to the <br />eliminsNOn of existin0 sefstY hazarAS. <br />4. FunAing priairy should ba ��iven to linking <br />dieeonNnuous facilities rether than con- <br />struction o} entirely nsw faeilitin. <br />Fundinp wurces vary from yaar to year depen- <br />di� on sute �nd federal lepislation. TAe <br />MetropWiqn Council wiq mainuin a liat ot eur- <br />mrt }undMp wuroe�. <br />a./ <br />