My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
COMMISSION_MINUTES_1978-03-30
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Parks, Recreation & Forestry Commission
>
Minutes
>
1970-1979
>
1978
>
COMMISSION_MINUTES_1978-03-30
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2022 11:54:36 AM
Creation date
9/5/2014 9:24:32 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Parks, Recreation & Forestry Commission
Documnet Type
Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
59
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
TRANSPORTAT�ON � <br />ridors of bicycle travel for transportation and <br />recreation purposes. <br />Metropolitan corridors shown in the System <br />Plan map were salected according to the follow- <br />ing criterie: high-volume bike t�aval potential, <br />access to multiple destinations or generators <br />isuch as schools and parksl, linking of adjacect <br />systems, ready accessibility and provision of <br />aesthetic oe racreational value as well as serving <br />transportation �eeds. <br />Actual location and development of bikeways <br />Should reflect this system and be consistent with <br />metropolitan policies and design guidelines. In <br />eonstructing facilities, opeiating jurisdic[ions <br />should s¢lect the specific location and type of <br />faeiliry (separeta path, lane or signed route) that <br />is most appropriate for the local conditions. Not <br />all bikeways are intended to be shown on this <br />plan, and municipalities are encouraged to <br />deveiop local systems to serve their own needs <br />and to provide links to tha metropolitan system. <br />REIATIONSHIP TO THE HEGIONAL <br />TRAILS POLICY PLAN <br />This proposed amendment on bicycle and <br />padestrian systems is intended to supplement <br />and expand upon the Transportation Policy <br />Plan, facusing primarily on destination-ariented <br />purposeful trips. A nend has also been identified <br />for a system ot regional trails to serva the <br />various modes of recreational travel, including <br />the bicycle mode. To fulfiil this need, a Regional <br />Treil Plan is also being prepared by the <br />MMropolitan Council to supplement the Recrea� <br />tion Open Space Policy Plan. Two major objec- <br />tives of the Regional Trail Plan are [o provide a <br />system of regional trails that will link com- <br />ponents of the Re9ional Recreation Open Space <br />Plan and/or natural recreation resou�ces and ta <br />provide a system of regional trails for recrea- <br />tional use with consideration given to transpor- <br />tation. Since many trail corridors in both the <br />Regional Trail Plan and this amendment serve <br />both transportatian and recteational functions, <br />the two plans are being developed to comple- <br />ment eaCh other. <br />The Metropolitan 8icycle System Plan and the <br />flegional Trail Plan ware coordinated in develop- <br />ment of policies and system plans (or bikeway <br />elements. This metropolitan bikeway plan, with <br />ita emphasis on bikes as e transportation mode, <br />is concentraeed within the Urban Service Area. <br />This feature recognizes the inereased role of <br />transportation by bicycles in the urbanized area. <br />Although it gives consideretion to t2nsporta- <br />tion, the Regional Trail Plan, on the other hand, <br />is primarily based on the recreational experience <br />and the connection o} Regional Rxteation ODan <br />Space areas throughout the Metrapolitan Area. <br />Analyzing the two sysiem plans shows that the <br />bikeway p�an defines more corridors within the <br />Urban Service Area. The Pegional Troil Plan, on <br />the other hand, identifies a partion of these <br />same corridors within the Urban Service Area <br />and defines additionel corridors outside it. These <br />tatter Regional Trail Plan corridon outside the <br />Urban Service Area are also included in the <br />bikeway plan. <br />CUIDELINES FOR DESIGN <br />The intent of Yhis sec[ion is to provide guidelines <br />to �ocai cammunities and oth�r agencies in the <br />physical development of bikeways. <br />Bikeways should be located to provide e sa(e, <br />high-quality biking ezperience. Routes seleCted <br />should be the safest and most direct routes. <br />maximizing contact with acUvity centers while <br />maintaining a pleasing cycli�g environment. <br />Bikeways antl padesYrian ways should be deaign- <br />ed to be compatible with their environment. <br />However, the geometrics and mainMnanae of a <br />bicycle or pedastrian taeility should encourage <br />its use in eompariwn to pare��e� fatilitiea whieh <br />were not designed with the bicyelist or <br />pedestrian in mind. <br />Bikeway and pedestrian ways should generally <br />utilize low-volume through straets. Facilities <br />placed on high-volume routea should be <br />physically separated from motor vehicla traHie. <br />The following referencea for bicy�la desig� stsn- <br />dards should be used as minimums: <br />1) "Bikeways Guide: Model Cri[erie (or <br />Bikeways and Recreational Lanes within tha <br />Highway Pight- of-Way:' November, 1974, by <br />Transportation Pla�ning, MinnesoW State Plann• <br />ing Agency, 550 Ceder Street, St. Paul, Min- <br />nesota 55101; <br />2) "Bicycle Trails Manual; ' by Minnesota <br />Department ol Natural Resources. Division of <br />Parks and Necreation, 32(1 Centennial Building, <br />St. Paul, Minnesota 5u155; and/or <br />�.. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.