My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
COMMISSION_MINUTES_1978-03-30
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Parks, Recreation & Forestry Commission
>
Minutes
>
1970-1979
>
1978
>
COMMISSION_MINUTES_1978-03-30
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2022 11:54:36 AM
Creation date
9/5/2014 9:24:32 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Parks, Recreation & Forestry Commission
Documnet Type
Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
59
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
9arnon� ,^"V'• !,•' <br />[�� <br />Board, criteria antl a Drogram are also determin� <br />etl for allocetion of Fetleral Aitl Urban funds. <br />Over 80 percent of the ezistin8 atreet system in <br />the urbani±ed Metmpolitan Area Itfiat is, almost <br />all locel streetsl ere safe and suitable for bike <br />ritlinB� �ow traKC volumes, reletivaly goad <br />pavement cond'nions and proximiry ta the ritler's <br />orie�n land often destination as welp make this <br />street system the most comprehensive bicycle <br />syatem feaaible in en urbanized area. Mast <br />municipe�kies have recognized this in their <br />bikeway planning. end many of the bikeways <br />plenned antl built by municipalities are signed <br />routes on lotel StteeU. <br />As of summer of 1975, over 00 municipalities in <br />the MetropolRan Araa had some sott of bicycle <br />plan et various steges of implementation, <br />akhough not all were o�tially atlopted by their <br />reapective Ba�erning botlies. Maps of these <br />pians were collecteO by 9he Minnesota Depart- <br />mant of Natural fleaources and bythe <br />Metmpoliten Couneil staff. Most of the <br />bikeways were on-sGeet facili5es Isignetl routes <br />orlanes) ratherthen separeted 6ike paths. <br />Nationel stutlies have shown Me eve28e hicycle <br />trip to be eOProximetely two miles. Tha average <br />pedestrian trip is much shortar and is oNen <br />made in conjunctian with another mode, such <br />ae the eutomObile or trensit. This 9hort everege <br />distance tloes �ot justify Dlenning at e <br />metropolitan level of an ezteneve system for <br />pedestrians. In moat portions of the Fully <br />Developetl Area', pedestrian sidewalks are <br />availeble. In addition, most of the local sveet <br />system in the Metropolitan Area, with its low <br />treific volumes, is also sate for petlesMan trevel. <br />However, existing contlitions for petlestrians in <br />areas of regional or subregional importence, <br />SuCh as the Metro Centere' or mejor Bctivity <br />centers, require some regional recognNiqn of the <br />neetl for improvement. <br />'The "Fully DeveloDeE Area' is the <br />Council's Development Fremework <br />tleei8nation Por the part M tha Metropolitan <br />Area coneisting of Minneapolis, St. Faul <br />and 74 finFrinB wbur6s. <br />"'Metro Canten" is another Devebpment <br />Framework term, referting to the two cen- <br />trol ciry downtowns an0 imme0letaly e0je- <br />cent tleveloDmenf. <br />NEEDS <br />Needs for improvin8 the petlestrier facilities in <br />the Metto Centers entl mejor activiry centert <br />heve bean itlentified in the Transportation Policy <br />Plen (Policies 4, 26, 38 antl 021. The two besic <br />needs for improvin8 bicycle facilitiea are the <br />neetl for connnuous facilinas, inclutling the <br />removal of physical barriers and ensuring syetem <br />conNnuity acroas polkicel bounderiee, end the <br />naed to provide forincreesed sefery ofthe bicy- <br />cle entl its user, including safe parking facilities <br />antl pro[ectetl, separate bicycle facilities in ereas <br />of potentielly great bicycla/motor vehicle con- <br />flicts. <br />A majar drawbeck to the use ot local streats for <br />bikewaYS is a lack ot continuiry, including <br />physicel entl psychological barriere, end the in- <br />abiliry to reach a tlestinatian entirely by use ot <br />locel stteets. Psychological berriers are D/imerily <br />busy streets which are physically Ooseible m <br />cross at-grade, but tha perceivetl Eifficulty of <br />this crossing creates a berriarin the biker's <br />mintl. These are more difficult to itlenGiy tlua to <br />varying percaptions, and therefore more diHicult <br />to overcome. <br />Studies tlone in tha Twin Cities area intlicete e <br />significant patantial for bicycle ritlerehip evan in <br />a climata whers, for ebout four end a hatt mon- <br />ths, the bicycle is not an attrac[ive means ot <br />transportetion.' Hitlers can 6e cete8orizetl by <br />their ekill antl the dietances they otten trevel in <br />the bieyele mode. Skill, trip purpoae, and length <br />of trip effect Me type of fecility thay prafer to <br />use. Other fectors that affect bicycle MOe ere <br />weather, safe parking at destinations, ritling ew- <br />face, length of days Idarknass is a hintlrencel, <br />trip time end lrip distence. <br />METROPOLITAN BICVCLE SYS7EM PLAN <br />The plan mep presented in this amentlment is <br />limited to bicycle facilities since the ehort <br />average diatence of pedestrian trips tloec not <br />justity plenning or mepping of an extenaive <br />repionel ayafem. The Bicycle Systam Plan map <br />provitles a guitleline fo the eetebliehment antl <br />location of bicycle facilitiec (orminB Ma <br />metropolitan eyarom. The ma0 tloes not <br />daeiB�ate epeciflc avaeta but �howe tlniratl corv <br />'Carl E. Ohrn, "Ealimaling Potantiel Bicyele <br />Uae end Public Inrenment". Berton- <br />Aechmen Asocinea, Inc. 1973. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.