My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
COMMISSION_MINUTES_1978-06-01
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Parks, Recreation & Forestry Commission
>
Minutes
>
1970-1979
>
1978
>
COMMISSION_MINUTES_1978-06-01
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2022 11:54:36 AM
Creation date
9/5/2014 9:24:38 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Parks, Recreation & Forestry Commission
Documnet Type
Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
55
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
_ <br />DEPARTMENT OF PARKS. <br />flECREATION AND FORESTRV <br />J <br />� o sue� <br />Cff � NI U�IG <br />5 RAMSEVCOUNTY,MINNESOTA <br />Y401 NIGHWAV 10 <br />. MOUNDSVIEW,MINN.65112 <br />pffiMD T0: parks and Recreation Commission <br />FROM: Staff <br />pATE; May 30, 1978 <br />R6: Fencing Yolicy � <br />Staff has completed the following research as directed by the Park Co�uission <br />concerning Mr. Lamppa's reques[ for fence replacement on Red Oak Drive. <br />Coat factors - The cost fox replacing the existing fence at 5119 Red Oak <br />would be as follows: <br />75' of 6' chain link fence @$6.00/foot =$450.00 <br />75' of 4' chain link fence @$4.00/foot = 5300.00 <br />75' of 5' open wire fence (similar to existing) @$3.25/foot =$243.75 <br />Other Communities Policiea on Pence Reolacement - Staff conferred with four <br />other (Shoreview, Maplewood, Roseville & New Brigh[on) municipal departmenta <br />and none of the ci[ies had a formal fence replacement policy. Each of <br />the Parks and Recreation Directora s[ated tha[ they have an inFormal policy <br />that they will no[ replace a private fence because of the precedent that it <br />would set. <br />They did atate that they would attevq�t to eliminate the problem at hand to <br />prevent further occurrencea by an alternative means. <br />The City of Maplewood has built fences bordering park property at the <br />request of private residents because of noise and vandalism probleme. <br />I[ should be noted in the Maplewood situations, their main consideration <br />was as to vhether the fence would improve the exieting park environment. <br />Location of Fence - I have attached a copy of the City fencing ordinance <br />outlining the existing code xequimments. The two ma�or points are that <br />the fence must be on the property of the individual conatructing the fence <br />and the maxioum helght is 8'. <br />I.egality of the Situatlon - Staff inet with Mr. Uick Meyera, City Attorney <br />who discussed the following pointe: <br />1. The City can not legally spend public funds on private property. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.