My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
COMMISSION_MINUTES_1978-11-02
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Parks, Recreation & Forestry Commission
>
Minutes
>
1970-1979
>
1978
>
COMMISSION_MINUTES_1978-11-02
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2022 11:54:36 AM
Creation date
9/5/2014 9:24:50 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Parks, Recreation & Forestry Commission
Documnet Type
Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
34
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
-Z- <br />Richard Kaiser, Jaycees President, requested <br />that communications remain open between the <br />Commission and Jaycees relative to Ardan Park <br />development. <br />White Oak Home- Director Anderson reviewed the White Oak Home- <br />owners Assoc, owners Association Project as described in the <br />Project Commission packets. Director Anderson expressed <br />concerns for possible problems with the future <br />development of Random Park, city liability, current <br />holding pond usage, and state, county and city <br />requirements were also concerns of staff. <br />Mr. Foster explained that the Association is <br />required to obtain city approval of the project <br />before the Rice Creek Watershed District will <br />even consider the project. <br />After discussion of the proposal as reviewed in <br />the Commission packets, the Commission raised <br />several questions. 1. What is the City's liahility?, <br />2. Will the water table raise in the area around <br />Random Park?, 3. Are tliere alternative methods?, <br />4. Has a topography st-•dv been done?, 5. Can the <br />process be spread out �. `ime?, 6. How long will <br />the draining last?, 7. Haoe there been any pre- <br />cidents?, 8. Has there been a soil test completed':, <br />9. Will an environmental impact statement be needed?, <br />10. What is the best time to do this project?, <br />11. Has the city a title on Random Park?, 12. What <br />is the reaction of the surrounding homeowners? and <br />13. Are there alternative dumping sites? <br />After long discussion it was agreed that additional <br />information is necessary. The Commission espressed � <br />concern for the project dumping at Random Park but � <br />was receptive to the Silver View Park dumping site. . <br />Motion was made by Commissioner Kuluvar to table <br />the issue until further research and information . <br />can be formulated on the Random Park title, Environ- ��, <br />mental Impact Report, nature of the sediment, its ' <br />size and type, the imgact on the storm sewer system <br />and furthes study into the Silver View dumping site. . <br />The motion was seconded by Commissioner Fedor. The . <br />motion passed unanimously. 5 Ayes <br />0 Nays <br />City Budget Director Anderson reviewed the city budget reflec- <br />ting on the Recreation Activity Fund, Recreation <br />Fund, Forestry Fund, General Fund and Parks and <br />Playground Fund. . <br />Silver View Director Anderson reported that the Silver View Phase <br />LAWCON Grant One Development Project is presently ranked N7 out of <br />46 applicants. The exact amount of monies available <br />will be known in about 3 weeks, but it appears that the � <br />project has an excellent chance of being funded. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.