My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
COMMISSION_MINUTES_1978-11-02
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Parks, Recreation & Forestry Commission
>
Minutes
>
1970-1979
>
1978
>
COMMISSION_MINUTES_1978-11-02
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2022 11:54:36 AM
Creation date
9/5/2014 9:24:50 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Parks, Recreation & Forestry Commission
Documnet Type
Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
34
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
GATEWAY <br />DEPARTMENT OF PARKS, <br />RECREATION AND FORESTRY <br />C�f of I�au�dS Ve� <br />� RqMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTN <br />Y401 HIGHWqV 10 <br />MOUNOS V IEW, MINN.55112 <br />MEMO T0: Mounds View Parks $ Recreation Commissioners <br />FROM: Staff <br />DATE: October 31,�1978 <br />RE: White Oak Homeowners Pond <br />Staff inet with Tom Foster from White Oak Homeowners Association <br />:.nd Steve kose, Building and Zoning Official on Thursday, <br />October 12 to review their proposal and to re-examine the <br />potential of the Silver View Park site. <br />After walking the grounds of both sites, it was determined that <br />the Silver View Park site was much more suited for the proposed <br />project. The reasons for this is: <br />1. Increase3 area to work with (16.5 acres as compared <br />to two. ) <br />2. No adjacent homeowners to contend with. <br />3. Matural holding pond area already in existance. <br />4. Drainage could be handled much more efficiently at <br />Silver View. <br />5. The project could all be accomplished at one time. <br />6. Silver View site will be able to accommodate the silt <br />until it is moved in the spring. <br />Staff outlined three stipulations from Nir. Foster in our corre- <br />spondence dated October 13, 1978, the three were: <br />1. A feasibility report from Roto-rooter as to whether the <br />project could be accomplishad. <br />2. A report on the proposed cost of the project. <br />3. Permission be secured from the affected property owners <br />on where the hose will be stretched. <br />At this point, Mr. Foster has not had an opportunity to secure <br />the property owners permission or prepared a cost feasibility study. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.