Laserfiche WebLink
3: <br />4. <br />- 15 - <br />2) Relevant capacity mea�ure (mile:a of trail, numbar. ' <br />� <br />�� of tables, Peet o£ beach, etc.) � � <br />. 3) Parking capacity on-site . . <br />h. Adjacent land uses . � . . .� <br />1) What are they . � � <br />� 2) Positive, negative efiect on use o£ facilitiea <br />Planned local areas � , � � <br />e. Nama of facility .(numbar or intersection designation will � <br />, do if no name has been decided) �. ., <br />b. Pmposefl ClassificaESon (Table )., Recreation Open Space <br />� Aevelopment Guide/POlicy Plan, see Appendix P). <br />c. Ownership/Administration � � <br />8. Approximate Location (map) � � - � . . <br />e. Proposed Size (acreage estimate) ., <br />Examples of protect3.on open space azeas that.have xeczeat�onal <br />value axe� � - � ' <br />a. Stream corridors are well-suited £or trail development be-.-�� <br />cause of sr:enic value and their unsnitability for dew-elop-��l-,. <br />ment which poses flood risks�nd potent-ial imp�ets on runof£ <br />rates. <br />b. Lakeshore varcels could be reserved fox public recreational <br />use to eahance adjacent property values and quality of <br />li£e in the nearby area, whi2e easing the lakeshore-de- <br />velopme..` xunoff 6urdens that degrade many urban lakes and <br />providing ecological and aesthetic benefits. <br />c. Wetlands, woodlands, and sCeeu slones have acenic value <br />when included in parks, and protecring them from development <br />prevents�erosion and runoff problems (on slopes and wood- <br />lands) and flooding, water quality and $roundwaCer problems <br />(in wetlands). <br />d. 6easonalty wet soils and shall�w *edroc�c �xe expensive to� <br />develop and service, and are better suited fox non-construc- <br />tion land uses like recreation. <br />. y' <br />\ <br />_ C: <br />