Laserfiche WebLink
hir. I mm <br />Page 3 <br />2. The City does not want to jeopardize future funding for the site and <br />would develop the original site if *he funding ;;ere to be eliminated <br />because of the land switch. <br />3. As the buo parcels of land in question are adjacent propzrties, it is the <br />City's contention that a possible re-location of the park is not a major <br />planning issue and that the major considerations should be: <br />1. Soil types <br />2. Topography <br />3. Development cost <br />4. Ingress and egress <br />5. Hydrology analysis <br />6. Acquisition costs <br />7. Ve9etation analysis <br />8. Surrounding land use <br />If yau have any further questions, feel free to give rte a call directly at <br />784-3055 extension 41. <br />Sincerely, <br />Rruce K. P.nderson, Di rector <br />Parks, Recreation & Forestry <br />BKA/pc <br />Enclosure <br />