Laserfiche WebLink
htr. Imm <br />Page 2 <br />6. The Phase One developrt:ent of Silver Vie:� was approved for a total of <br />�75,200 plus trail developrrent monies. Developrtent slated for Phase <br />One includes: <br />Site improveimnt <br />Water system <br />Ballfield <br />Parking lot and access road <br />Oesign and engineering <br />audit <br />Total <br />$13,264 <br />$15,000 <br />b 9,550 <br />525,3b0 <br />b e,soo <br />$ 1,750 <br />b�s,zoo <br />7. We were informed by your office to not begin formal n=gotiations for the <br />land acquisition until the agreerr,ents were finalized which was June 25, <br />1979. <br />�"T <br />8. Since that time City staff has met with Kraus-Anderson owners of the <br />land in question and they submitted a counter proposat to the City <br />which would involve a land "swap" of the City's existing land for land <br />on the northwest corner of Sitver Lake Road and County Raad I. <br />9. Staff concurs with Kraus-Anderson that tnis proposed 1and s�ap wouid benefit <br />both parties and we have continued to exp7ore that possibility. <br />10. As of 8/13/79, the Lity has not consumated any land sale and the park is <br />still being proposed in its original 7ocation. City Staff is meeting with <br />Kraus-Anderson on Tuesday, August 14 to continue our negotrations. <br />11. The existin concerns center around the t"� <br />9 proposed grant application Phase Z <br />development of Silver View Park in 7980 which includes: <br />a. Tennis Courts <br />b. Concession buildin9 <br />c. General landscaping <br />Staff proposed tl�e 1980 Phase 2 grant application in the new location wbich <br />as of 8/13/79�has not been finalized. <br />In conclusion PAounds View's position as to th_ location of Sitver View Park is as <br />fotlows: <br />7. We believe that the proposed site of County Road I and Sitver Lake Road aould <br />be a more ideal location for the fol7owing reasons: <br />a. Access to the site of tounty Road I is more conducivz than Silver Lake <br />Raad because of traffic volum�e. <br />b. Minimal grading viould be necessary in the County Road I site as <br />compared to extensive grading and filt on H-2. <br />c. The land has been appraised at a lower value on County Road I. <br />d. The developer would benefit from the property on County Road H-2 <br />because of: <br />l. Existing terrain . <br />2. Soil types �. <br />3. Tree stand <br />