My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
COMMISSION_MINUTES_1980-05-01
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Parks, Recreation & Forestry Commission
>
Minutes
>
1980-1989
>
1980
>
COMMISSION_MINUTES_1980-05-01
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2022 12:21:41 PM
Creation date
9/5/2014 9:25:25 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Parks, Recreation & Forestry Commission
Documnet Type
Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
47
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Memn to Barry Bauer <br />Page 2� <br />[eam began to laok a[ how we could maximize the use of the enisting facilities <br />without reducing the playing area. <br />� <br />1T.e key ingredients became the overlapping of field areas for different spor[ <br />seasona and relocatiag the existing facilities to allow for greater comm�mity <br />access. <br />The following timeline. cos[s and ra[ionals axe broken down on a per year <br />basis that extends over four years: ' <br />1978 - The planning teams number ane priority was the establishment oi <br />turf, which would allow for a good fouadat3on frvm which to build all <br />futuze facilities. The major item that vas felt a necessity in establishing <br />turf-wae the Snstallaiion of an�mdergro�md irrigation syatem which vould <br />greatly assiat in the establishment of turf and allow for pzoperly managed <br />maintenance pragram. The major consideratioa or drawback in the irrigation <br />syatem centera aro�md the poteatial shortage of water in fu[ure years. <br />Thexe arn 3 reasona why we felt an irrigaeion system would be of the <br />gseateet benefit: <br />1. Will reduce the overall maintenance program, 2. The water costs <br />are reduced by havlag the system deaigned for one specif3c facility, <br />3. It is [he anly proven way to establish and maintain turf on a <br />heavily used athletic facility. <br />T4e to[al coat of the irrigation system will be about $15,000.00 including <br />design, fixturna, installa[ion and warranty. <br />Before [he irrigation sys[em can be installed a comprehensive grading plan <br />will be developed, followed by complete re-grading of the site. The projected <br />coexs for the engineer consul[ant work including the final grade plan is <br />$1,000.00 aad the ac[ual grading is projected at $5,000.00. <br />The eatablishment of turf would coat about 57,000.00 which includea seed, <br />fertilizer, blarlc dirt and disc-anchoring. <br />The fival cast vould be ag-lime for the infields of [he baseball area <br />@$600.00/field or 52,400.00. <br />A recap of the 1978 projec[ions is as falla�as: <br />Development of grading plan $1,000.00 <br />Gcading $5,000.00 <br />Irrigation System $15,000.00 <br />Turf eatablishment $7,000.00 <br />Ag-lime for infields $2,400.00 <br />Total $30,400.00 <br />1979 - The major project proposed foz 1979 is the conatruc[ion and relocation <br />of the four tennis courts. As staied the existing courta are in gz.at need <br />of repair� including resurfacing, fencing, color coaCing and new fence poete. <br />The exieting plart pmposea [hat the four exiating courte be used for <br />basketball, hard court surface for wlleyball, four equare, etc. or as � <br />practice courts or overflow courta. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.