Laserfiche WebLink
.Parks and Recreation Cov¢nission Minutes � <br />2/26/81 Page 6 <br />Commissioner Linke responded that he felt the <br />majority of the voters didn't have any problem <br />with the plan bu[ didn't approve the money financint <br />portion. <br />Planning Co�mnissioner Loeding felt that the vote <br />definitely reflected a vot on the park plan rather <br />than just the money. <br />A general discussion then followgd between the <br />two Commissions regarding the referendum and <br />what the vote actually indicated. There was no <br />general consensus between the two Commissions. <br />The Parks and Recreation Commission discussed <br />reasons as to why the referendum may have failed; <br />Coffinissioner Scott stated that the School <br />Referendvm had an input, Conunissioner Silvis <br />stated that being with the general election didn't <br />help it. <br />Planning Co�issioner Glazer than asked how the <br />plan could be implemented should a referendum not <br />be successful again. <br />Chairperson Burmeister responded that it could be <br />fimded through L.A.W.C.O.N. and general funds but <br />it would take a long period of time. <br />Planning Coc�m�issioner Loeding then asked whether �� <br />the Parks and Recreation Coimnisaion would be in <br />favor of having a referendum to determine whether - <br />or not the plan itself was acceptable to the <br />voters. <br />