My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
COMMISSION_MINUTES_1985-03-28
MoundsView
>
City Commissions
>
Parks, Recreation & Forestry
>
Minutes
>
1980-1989
>
1985
>
COMMISSION_MINUTES_1985-03-28
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/4/2024 1:58:26 PM
Creation date
9/5/2014 9:27:19 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Parks, Recreation & Forestry Commission
Documnet Type
Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
��� <br />GREENFI`ELD PARK <br />CONSULTANT SELECTTON <br />STUDY <br />-2- <br />agriculture department as it as been past <br />policy to only spray when egg masses have <br />--.-�.�-��... a.� waa Lurcner inalCateG by <br />staff that the inspection process and inter- <br />views with the residents had gone without any <br />problems in, early October and staff stated' <br />that the Parks and Recreation Commission <br />would be continually updated on this issue. <br />Staff distributed copies of a request for <br />proposal that had been developed to receive <br />proposals from engineering and landscape <br />architect firms for Phase I Greenfield Park <br />Development. The RFP outlined a specific <br />scope of services which would provide trie <br />Park and Recreation Commission a better han- <br />dle on comparing firms rather than making an <br />open end process. <br />Staff indicated that in addition to the final <br />hid proposal process, he felt that the Park <br />Commission should be involved in interviewiny <br />the finalists, following the review of pro- <br />posals, With the final selection being made <br />at a sp�cial meeting. A proposed time line <br />was reviewed by staff with proposals to .be <br />returned by late Novembet and a firm selected <br />in early December. Chairperson indicated <br />that time is of the essence in that due to <br />the hydrolics and special engineering re- <br />quired for this project, a firm with some <br />engineering background would be of great help <br />He further indicated that a special meeting <br />should be established to review the RFPs once <br />that are submitted. A motion was then made <br />by Commissioner Bowman, seconded by Commis- <br />sioa Long to direct staff to forward request <br />to solicite proposals from area engineering <br />and landscape architect consultants based on <br />the scope of services provided and that a <br />special Park Commission meeting be estab- <br />li�hed in December to review and interview <br />the finalists. The motion passed unanimous- <br />ly, 4 ayes, 0 nays. <br />COMPOST PROGRAM UPDATE Staff distributed a memo of the City°s com- <br />post program which commenced operation for <br />the fall season on October 17, 1984. Staff <br />indicated that the modifications suggested by <br />the Park Commission to add a second for a <br />straight drive-thru, has been extremely posi- <br />;�� t ive and enabl ing the traf f ic to f low througP� <br />the site with back-ups at a minimum. <br />0 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.