Laserfiche WebLink
���°». <br />APPRUVAL OF MINUTES <br />REVIEW UE THE 1985 <br />ANNUAL REPORT <br />DISCUSSIUN �N TASK <br />FUItCE FOR PARK FUNUING <br />A'LTF.RNATIVES <br />-3- <br />Commissioner Lony stated that he supported <br />mndifyiny the existiny ordinance but was con- <br />. C� <br />� <br />9 <br />tnat ne telt sottball-tournaments were a <br />leyitimate!recreation form and that the salz <br />of beer should be allowed at weekend tourna- <br />ments. The Commission generally concurred <br />that some type of permit system should be <br />developed for the sale of alcohol and that <br />they would support beer drinking moderately <br />in the City Parks. <br />A motion was made by Commissioner Silvis, <br />seconded by Commissioner Lony to allow the <br />sale of alcohol in parks through a permit <br />system that would be developed by staff to <br />allow community oryanizations to sell beer <br />within the City's park system. The motion <br />further stated that the staff draft an ordi- <br />nance to replace Chapter 52.03 which would <br />state that beer could be consumed in the <br />parks based on the Mounds View Police Depart- <br />ment's support oE this issue. <br />The motion passed unanimously 5 ayes, 0 <br />nayes. <br />A motion was made by Commissioner Bowman, <br />seconded by Commissioner Lony to approve the <br />October 24, 1984; December 5, 1984; January <br />3, 1985; January 31, 1985; and March 13. 1985 <br />Park and Recreation Commission meeting <br />minutes as presented. The motion passed <br />unanimously 5 ayes, 0 nayes. <br />Staff distributed copies of the 1985 Parks <br />and Recreation Department Annual Report and <br />indicated that this item would be reviewed at <br />a future meetiny. Staff reyuested that each <br />of the Commissioners review the annual report <br />and respond to any yuestions or concerns they <br />may have at the April Commission Meeting. <br />�taff reviewed a memorandum outlining the <br />development oE a task force for park funding <br />alternatives. The Cammission reviewed the <br />item an�i statPd khat they would like to have <br />stafE to develop more specific criteria as �� <br />what the task force might accdmplish, time <br />frames, and who would he appointed to the <br />task force. The Commission asked that this <br />item be reviewed at the Apri1 Commission <br />Meetiny. <br />