My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
COMMISSION_MINUTES_1985-10-24
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Parks, Recreation & Forestry Commission
>
Minutes
>
1980-1989
>
1985
>
COMMISSION_MINUTES_1985-10-24
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2022 12:25:03 PM
Creation date
9/5/2014 9:27:31 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Parks, Recreation & Forestry Commission
Documnet Type
Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
_g_ <br />Staff further stated that they were <br />exploring the feasibility of submitting <br />� a grant for a permanent aerat3on system <br />at Spring Lake in 1986. Staff stated <br />that the one major problem with request- <br />ing a grant for Spring Lake would be <br />that a state approved boat launch would <br />have to be constructed before any grant <br />for aeration equipment would be con- <br />sidered. 5taff further indicated that <br />it was hoped that both Anoka and Ramsey <br />County, as well as Spring Lake Park and <br />Fridley would contrihute to this pro- <br />ject, as it would directly benefit each <br />of them. Staff indicated that a formal <br />report would be presented to the City <br />Counc3l on �ctober 7 and Rhat an update <br />would be presented at the October 24 <br />Commission meeting. <br />DI5CUSSION ON <br />PROPOSED TASK FORCE Staff distributed a memo on the proposed <br />task force project with a list of nine <br />people who have indicated interest in <br />serving on a task force for park funding <br />alternatives. The Commission reviewed <br />the list of people and indicated their <br />,.-. support. The Commission further stated <br />that the original task force guidelines <br />� for funding alternatives was still real- <br />istic and directed staff to proceed with <br />the project. 5taff indicated that a <br />meeting would be held before the next <br />Park Commission meeting. Commissioner <br />Silvis indicated that he would be inter- <br />ested in serving as the liaison from the <br />Parks and Recreatian Commission, and <br />staff indicated that each of the Commis- <br />sioners were welcome to attend. Staff <br />further stated that regular mailings <br />wauld occur throughout the process. <br />PARK T�DUR Staff conducted a brief tour of Green- <br />field Park and updated each of the <br />, Commissioners on our progress to date. <br />It was stated at Greenfield Park that <br />the major projects yet to be completed <br />were seeding, which would be done dor- <br />mantly due to the frost, and additional <br />landscape work around the trail and <br />parkinq lot areas. Staff also stated <br />that some additional landscaping would <br />be completed at the site within the next <br />three weeks. The Commission then toured <br />the Groveland Park tot lot whieh was <br />'�+.� recently installed by the City Hall <br />staff. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.