Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View City Council June 13, 2016 <br />Regular Meeting Page 12 <br /> <br />were to approve a pay increase, it would not take effect until January of 2017. He requested <br />direction from the Council on how to proceed. <br /> <br />Mayor Flaherty believed that the time and effort given by each Councilmember warranted a pay <br />increase. He stated the current monthly stipend was less than minimum wage. He indicated he <br />would support a reasonable increase. <br /> <br />Council Member Hull asked if an increase could be made in 2017 and 2018. City Administrator <br />Ericson explained that an increase could be approved for 2017 and then the future Council could <br />take action again in 2018 for 2019. <br /> <br />Council Member Meehlhause believed an increase would be timely. He recommended the <br />Mounds View pay be comparable with median paying cities. He supported the Mayor being paid <br />$7,500 and Councilmembers being paid $6,000, noting this would only impact the budget by <br />$2,500. <br /> <br />Council Member Mueller believed that after 13 years a raise would be in order. <br /> <br />Council Member Gunn agreed with Council Member Meehlhause’s suggestion as this would get <br />the City to median pay for the Mayor and Councilmembers. <br /> <br />Mayor Flaherty feared that raising his pay 19% would be frowned upon by the public. He <br />recommended a 5% raise across the board and that another pay raise be considered in 2018. <br /> <br />Council Member Gunn reviewed the amount neighboring communities paid their Mayor and City <br />Councilmembers. She reported at this time, the Mayor is paid $6,300 and the Councilmembers <br />are paid $5,700 per year. She supported the raise as suggested by Council Member Meehlhause <br />given the fact the Mayor and Council has not received a raise in 13 years. <br /> <br />City Administrator Ericson encouraged the Council to get the pay closer to the average given the <br />fact another pay raise may not be approved for another five to ten years. <br /> <br />Mayor Flaherty encouraged the Council to continue to think on this topic and requested staff to <br />bring it back at a future meeting. <br /> <br />City Administrator Ericson stated the other issue that needs to be addressed by the Council was <br />the EDA levy for 2017. He explained in November of last year, the Council amended the EDA’s <br />enabling language to allow the EDA to levy dollars. He reviewed the maximum amount that <br />could be levied by the EDA stating this could not be more than $161,236 and would cause a 3% <br />levy increase. He stated at this time, the City could not support economic development as it did <br />not have the funds. He asked how the Council wanted to proceed with this issue. <br /> <br />Council Member Hull asked if the extra levy would include personnel salaries. City <br />Administrator Ericson described how the City covered Business Development Coordinator <br />Beeman’s salary was covered with increment from TIF District 5. <br />