My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 2013/10/14
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2013
>
Agenda Packets - 2013/10/14
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:50:35 PM
Creation date
2/27/2018 2:25:13 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
10/14/2013
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
10/14/2013
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
64
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
2 <br />3 <br />4 <br />5 <br />6 <br />7 <br />8 <br />9 <br />to <br />11 <br />12 <br />13 <br />14 <br />15 <br />16 <br />17 <br />18 <br />19 <br />20 <br />21 <br />22 <br />23 <br />24 <br />25 <br />26 <br />27 <br />28 <br />29 <br />30 <br />31 <br />32 <br />33 <br />34 <br />35 <br />36 <br />37 <br />38 <br />39 <br />40 <br />41 <br />42 <br />43 <br />44 <br />45 <br />Mounds View City Council August 26, 2013 <br />Regular Meeting Page 3 <br />MOTION/SECOND: Mueller/Meehlhause. To Waive the Reading and Adopt Resolution 8143, <br />Authorizing Fire Inspection Services Agreement with the Spring Lake Fire Department. <br />Ayes — 5 Nays — 0 Motion carried. <br />A. Resolution 8141, Approving the Preliminary Levy and General Fund Budget. <br />Finance Director Beer explained that approval of the preliminary levy and general fund budget by <br />the Council was the first step in the budgeting process. He indicated once the levy was set, it <br />could not be increased, only lowered. He stated the Council has set a 3% levy for the coming <br />year, which would create an additional $125,000 to the City's general fund. He then discussed <br />the general fund budget and recommended approval of the preliminary levy and budget. <br />Mayor Flaherty commented the levy approved this evening was preliminary and may be <br />decreased by the time the budget was finalized in December. <br />MOTION/SECOND: Mueller/Meehlhause. To Waive the Reading and Adopt Resolution 8141, <br />Approving the Preliminary Levy and General Fund Budget for Fiscal Year 2014. <br />Ayes — 5 Nays — 0 Motion carried. <br />B. Review of Tires N' More, 2832 County Road 10, Conditional Use Permit. <br />Planning Associate Heller stated that in August of 2012 the Council approved a conditional use <br />permit for Tires N' More to operate out of the old Pak Building, which is located at 2832 County <br />Road 10. Attached to this conditional use permit were several conditions, such as the installation <br />of a fence on the west property line, installation of a sprinkler system. However, an outstanding <br />issue remains in that the applicant was to install a new parking lot on the site by September 1, <br />2013. <br />Planning Associate Heller indicated there has been a disagreement between the applicant and <br />CVS as to how the parking lot should be completed given the fact there was a cross access <br />easements. She commented the property owner was not available this evening as he was dealing <br />with a family emergency out of the country. She explained the Council could suspend or revoke <br />the Conditional Use Permit. She requested the Council discuss this matter further and direct staff <br />on how to proceed. <br />Mayor Flaherty commented that the agreement between CVS and the previous property owner <br />was the concern at this time. It was his opinion that a large portion of the parking lot could have <br />been completed even though there was a small part of the property that remained in dispute. He <br />questioned if the new property owners had a plan for the parking lot. Planning Associate Heller <br />indicated there was a plan for the parking lot and CVS was not in agreement with the proposed <br />plan. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.