My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-02-2018 WS
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2018
>
01-02-2018 WS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:45:39 PM
Creation date
2/27/2018 2:35:03 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
1/2/2018
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
1/2/2018
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
29
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
I Introduction <br />Do increases in alcohol outlet density increase crime? The media and the general <br />public certainly think so: One CBS 5 Investigates report documented how liquor stores <br />that stay open late at night in downtown Californian neighborhoods tend to be a <br />congregation place of gangs, leading to such stores becoming `hot spots' for violent <br />crime; Another report from the Sacramento Bee quotes Sacramento Police Captain Ted <br />Mandalla commenting that "people purchase alcohol and consume it close by, and then <br />they become bold enough to do things they wouldn't ordinarily do, or (they) consume <br />alcohol and become prey". Subsumed within the larger umbrella of rational choice theory, <br />a criminological theory that fits the above description is Cohen and Felson's (1979) <br />routine activities theory, which states that crime results from a nonrandom convergence <br />in time and space of likely offenders (drunkards and/or drug addicts), suitable targets <br />(other intoxicated individuals or passer-bys) and the lack of able guardians (absence of a <br />strong police presence). <br />Is the crime increase brought about by alcohol outlets confined to the immediate <br />vicinity of the outlet? Or does the increased availability of alcohol also lead to an <br />increase in alcohol abuse, thereby increasing crime in the broader neighborhood of the <br />outlet as well? According to a Bureau of Justice Statistics 1998 report, 40% of criminal <br />offenders report using alcohol during the time of offense, while 60% say they have been <br />drinking regularly the year before the offense was committed. This suggests that alcohol <br />consumption may play a role in crime, although the exact magnitude of its impact and the <br />causal channels through which it operates, if any, remain unknown. <br />Possibly due to an increased awareness from media reports and growing <br />frustrations of residents who live close to liquor stores, it has become increasingly <br />common to see reports in local newspapers of residents uniting to either close down <br />problem liquor stores or to prevent more liquor stores from opening in their <br />neighborhood. However, while numerous studies find a correlation between alcohol <br />outlet density and crime, to my knowledge, no study has shown a causal relationship <br />between alcohol outlets and crime. Hence, although there is strong evidence that alcohol <br />outlet density is related to crime, it remains inconclusive as to whether alcohol outlets <br />themselves cause crime, result in a displacement of crime from surrounding areas, or <br />2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.