My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2016 Planning Commission Packets
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2016
>
2016 Planning Commission Packets
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/20/2018 5:32:08 PM
Creation date
3/20/2018 5:18:13 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
542
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
David Sands, who chairs the authority's board, said specific numbers may need to be adjusted within the <br />two sets of goals, but they generally match. The solicitation, which will be released Feb. 1, outlines eight <br />priorities that generalize and combine the vision of county and city planners. <br />The solicitation is looking for tax base growth, job creation, transit and mobility opportunities, energy and <br />environmental resiliency, housing diversity, natural resources protection, community vitality and <br />interconnection, and enhanced recreational features. <br />"What can't the five of us — or the four of you at least — not agree on in terms of those generalized <br />goals," Sands asked board members. <br />Mark Ruff, the board's financial adviser, stopped the meeting at one point to say that developers are <br />used to navigating differing goals between multiple stakeholders. <br />"That's pretty typical" for developers, Ruff said. "So the larger question is less about how the developer <br />feels about this, and more about your comfort level moving forward with the solicitation without your <br />own goals and objectives." <br />The solicitation will require responses by March 2, but planners will host a developer information session <br />and pre -proposal conference Feb. 11 for interested bidders. <br />According to the master plan, which has been approved by the city but not Ramsey County to date, <br />officials are looking for a proposal that offers a mix of housing types to accommodate about 3,000 new <br />residents. They want 4,000 jobs to be added through retail and office space. Of the 633 total acres on <br />the site, 320 of them would be developable. <br />Ramsey County officials announced last month they had finished cleanup of the Superfund site, which is <br />in the northeast quadrant of Interstate 35W and Highway 96. <br />Planners are asking developers to be creative with their responses to an 11 -question solicitation, which <br />asks about the strength of the development team and strategies to attract major employers. <br />A solicitation review committee will select top candidates by March 18 and make a recommendation to <br />the authority by March 31. Ultimately, the authority will make the final master developer selection and <br />Ramsey County, the owner of the land, will negotiate purchasing terms. <br />As the authority wrapped up the final vote Monday, Holden picked apart the language in the motion. <br />Originally, the motion read that the board would authorize the formation of "the" solicitation review <br />committee. Holden, who said she would like more say over the proposed members of the review <br />committee, asked that the board change the wording to read "a" solicitation review committee. <br />The tension at Monday's meeting is an indicator of how seriously officials are taking the development, <br />Heather Worthington, Ramsey County's deputy manager, said Tuesday. <br />"What they showed last night is great leadership in saying'OK, we might not agree on every single detail, <br />but we are in consensus in how to move forward," she said. "We know the best way to move forward is <br />to issue the solicitation and pick a master developer and then get this site back on the tax rolls."' <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.