My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 1999/07/12
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1999
>
Agenda Packets - 1999/07/12
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:48:58 PM
Creation date
6/12/2018 10:29:34 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
7/12/1999
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
7/12/1999
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
57
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
UNAPPROVED <br />Ericson stated that there would be three three-bedroom units, one two-bedroom unit, and each will have a <br />tuck -under garage. He stated that the three-bedroom units would have two- car garages each, and the <br />two-bedroom unit would have a one -car garage. He stated that all of the units will have two parking <br />spaces in front and staff feels there would be no problems with parking on this site. <br />Ericson stated that the easement documents had not yet been dedicated or executed, and they were <br />waiting for the completion of the title work. He stated that the subject property was formerly a tax -forfeit <br />property over which the City previously had control, and there were some issues with the County in <br />regard to resolving the paperwork. He stated that the applicant has signed an Intent to Dedicate Easement <br />document, and provided the Council with a copy of that document. Ericson stated that the applicant <br />would be dedicating the easements and this would authorize the building permits in place of the easement <br />documents, until the paperwork was completed. <br />Council Member Marty stated that it appeared there was progress in regard to the easement for drainage. <br />MOTION/SECOND: Marty/Thomason. To approve Resolution 5344, a Resolution Approving a <br />Development Review for a Four -Unit Multiple Family Residential Dwelling Located at 7613-7619 <br />Woodlawn Drive; Planning Case No. 558-99. <br />Ayes — 4 Nays — 0 Motion carried. <br />J. Consideration of a Motion Authorizing the Mayor and Clerk -Administrator to <br />Finalize the Agreement with the YMCA for Management of the Community Center, <br />Parks and Recreation and to Execute said Agreement for and on Behalf of the City <br />Finance Director Kessel stated that various minor changes had been made to the YMCA Agreement <br />based upon the review by the City Attorney. He stated that there was one slight adjustment not reflected <br />in Council's packet, relating to the YMCA use of City vehicles. He stated that the draft indicated that the <br />YMCA agreed to maintain liability insurance for such usage, naming the City as an additional insured. <br />He stated that this does not address the issue of damage, and recommended the addition of a statement <br />indicating that if a vehicle was damaged, the City would be reimbursed for the cost of the damage. <br />Council Member Stigney requested clarification regarding the automatic renewal of the contract for two <br />five-year terms. He stated that the language indicates that the contract could either be terminated or <br />renegotiated, noting that there was no provision for amendment, even if both parties agreed to amend. He <br />suggested the language specify that amendment of the contract was allowable. <br />Finance Director Kessel stated that Article 8, Item B of the Agreement allows for this provision, noting <br />that the City Attorney may wish to address the issue further. City Attorney Long stated that the issue was <br />properly addressed in this Item, adding that notice of termination of the contract would also provide for <br />amendment of the Agreement. <br />Council Member Stigney stated that another concern was in regard to the duties and responsibilities of the <br />YMCA, as specified in the Agreement. He stated that he did not see any language pertaining to the <br />general management and operations operating within a budget. He noted that if there was a loss, the City <br />would pay for the first $2000 and any remaining debt would be equally shared by the City and the <br />YMCA. He stated that he would like to see terminology indicating that they would operate in a prudent <br />and economical manner. <br />19 CAADMIN\MINUTES\CC\6-28-99.CC <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.