Laserfiche WebLink
UNAPPROVED <br />City Attorney Long stated that if they were going to have specific conditions of this nature, the additional <br />requirement should be clarified. He stated that the conditions could be general and if they reached an <br />agreement with the owner, approved by the Building Inspector. <br />Mayor Coughlin asked if they could stipulate in the requirement, a time period during which staff and the <br />owner could discuss the issues and come to some conclusion, and then bring the matter back before the <br />Council for consideration. <br />City Attorney Long stated that the procedural dilemma the Council was facing was in dealing with the <br />renewal of the license which is granted for a year. He stated that once the license is granted, they could <br />not add conditions. He stated that this has to be done at the time of the renewal action. City Attorney <br />Long suggested that, if the applicant was present, they might obtain a general agreement that the renewal <br />would contain a condition that some type of noise buffering be provided, in a form acceptable to the <br />Building Inspector. <br />Mayor Coughlin asked if the Council should separate this license renewal from the others, in order to <br />approve those not being contested. City Attorney Long stated yes. Mayor Coughlin stated that the <br />Council would remove Robert's Off 10 from the motion, at that time. <br />MOTION/SECOND: Thomason/Stigney. A Motion to Approve the Intoxicating Liquor License <br />Renewals for Network Liquors, 2345 County Road H2, Budget Liquor, 2577 Highway 10, ABC Liquor, <br />2740 Highway 10, Donatelle's, 2400 Highway 10, and Mermaid, Inc., 2220 Highway 10. <br />Ayes — 4 Nays — 0 Motion carried. <br />Council Member Marty asked about the possibility of issuing a temporary or partial license to Robert's <br />Off 10, so that the Council could revisit the matter in the future. He stated that he did not wish to close <br />down the operation, but was uncertain if they could resolve all the issues during the meeting. City <br />Attorney Long stated that he would like the opportunity to confer with staff regarding the matter, to <br />determine whether the Code provided authorization to renew the license for less than a one year period. <br />Mayor Coughlin suggested that with the consent of Council, they could postpone this consideration, and <br />reconsider it later in the meeting. City Attorney Long stated that this would be helpful. <br />I. Consideration of Resolution 5344 Approving a Development Review for a Four -plea <br />on Vacant Land at 7613-7619 Woodlawn Drive <br />Planning Associate Ericson stated that this was a request for a Development Review for a four-plex to be <br />located on Woodlawn Drive. He stated that the applicant has already received approval for a four-plex <br />adjacent to this property which is currently under construction. He stated that all of the dimensional <br />requirements have been met and the only issue of concern was in regard to the drainage, which was a <br />problem with the adjacent four-plex as well. Ericson stated that the property owner to the north had <br />agreed to permit the applicant to install a storm sewer that would drain into a catch basin in County Road <br />I. He stated that this should resolve any potential problems. He stated that the City Engineer had <br />reviewed a substitute drainage plan, which provided for on-site drainage that could be utilized if the storm <br />sewer could not be installed. He stated, however, that it appeared the storm sewer would be installed. <br />18 CA\ADMIN\MINUTES\CC\6-28-99.CC <br />