My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 2018/03/05
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2018
>
Agenda Packets - 2018/03/05
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:46:46 PM
Creation date
6/13/2018 11:20:48 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
3/5/2018
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
3/5/2018
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
115
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
on/off layers of information, and view alternative plans, e.g. this is what a specific neighborhood <br />would look like if there were 2-3 units per acre (single-family), vs. 17 units per acre ("Boulevard") <br />vs. 62 units per acre ("Crossroad Pointe"). The website would survey users as to their <br />preferences. Estimated costs are based on Stantec setting up the website and maps. <br />PHONE SURVEY ($10,000 - $20,000) <br />This involves a vendor calling residents (400) and asking a series of questions. Recipients <br />include both land lines and cell phones. Questions can be both quantitative (do you agree or <br />disagree) and qualitative (open ended). Estimated costs are based on the number of questions <br />asked. Example; 60 questions = 15 minute survey (average), costs $14,000. Mounds View <br />conducted Quality of Life surveys in 1988, 1993, 2005, and in 2015 specific to Organized <br />Collection. <br />Budget Impacts: <br />The Comprehensive Plan is not budgeted for community engagement. The Council has directed <br />Staff to reduce the approved budget for the Plan (about $45,000 for planning), which would <br />occur by Staff (Jon & Nyle) writing much of the text, as time permits. Any savings could be <br />applied toward the costs of community engagement. <br />Recommendation: <br />Staff recommends conducting an Open House at the Town Hall meeting, and conducting a <br />phone survey addressing "quality of life" questions, with a concentration of questions that would <br />benefit preparation of the Comprehensive Plan. If the Council directs Staff to proceed, a <br />proposal would be provided by the Morris Leatherman Company at a future Council meeting. <br />A phone survey would be statistically representative of the community, versus relying on <br />unsolicited participation with website surveys and in-person discussions. <br />No -cost alternatives include assuming the 2005 Mounds View survey reflects today, and <br />referring to more recent surveys conducted by other suburbs; Roseville (2016), Chanhassen <br />(2016), Vadnais Heights (2016), Champlin (2012), assuming those residents would reflect <br />similar values and priorities as Mounds View residents. <br />If the Council wishes to proceed with a phone survey, consideration should be given as to other <br />topics to cover. Examples; <br />• Increasing levy limits • Affordable housing <br />• Specific park amenities & programs • Shooting range <br />• Use of city communications <br />Attached: <br />Mounds View Quality of Life Survey (2005) <br />Respectfully, <br />449�, clix <br />Jon Sevald, AICP <br />City Planner / Supervisor <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.