My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 2018/03/05
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2018
>
Agenda Packets - 2018/03/05
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:46:46 PM
Creation date
6/13/2018 11:20:48 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
3/5/2018
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
3/5/2018
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
115
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
04/07/2005 10:37 6129201069 DECISION RESOURCES PAGE 04 <br />11 What if the Golf Course were self- <br />supporting and did not require a. <br />subsidy from the City's General <br />Fund, would you favor or oppose <br />selling the property for redevel- <br />opment? (WAIT FOR RESPONSE) Do you <br />feel strongly that way? <br />STRONGLY FAVOR ........ 20% <br />FAVOR .................19% <br />OPPOSE................20% <br />STRONGLY OPPOSE ....... 17t <br />DON'T KNOW/REFUSED.-24% <br />12. How would you rate the general. EXCELLENT .............17% <br />condition and appearance of pro- GOOD ..................59t <br />perties in your neighborhood -- ONLY FAIR .............19% <br />excellent, good, only fair or POOR ................... 4% <br />poor'? DON'T NNOW/RtFUSED.....2% <br />13, Which ONE of the fQL.1.Qwing improvements to County Highway 10 <br />do you consider to be of the greatest benefit? <br />MOST SECN <br />Pedestrian crosswalks ...................31-%.....13!s <br />Trailways ............... ...... ........ <br />Lighting ......... __ .................. _7%,. <br />Landscaping .............................. 9-% <br />monument sign at the city's borders ---- _1% ...... 3� <br />,Lmproved appearance of businesses....... _'7%.....1 2% <br />Realigning intersections to 90 degrees ... 6.% ..... 10% <br />Renaming Highway 10 .....................11%... .. 4% <br />ALL EQUAL..............................4%.....,3% <br />NONE OF THE ABOVE........................7%.....10$ <br />DON'T KNOW/REFUSED ........ ...............7%.....1394 <br />14. Which ONE do you consider to be of the second, greatest <br />benefit? (RE -READ LIST IF NECESSARY; DELETE FIRST CHOICE; <br />ROTATE LIST) <br />15. Do you favor or oppose the City's STRONGLY FAVOR ......... 6 -'1 - <br />use of eminent domain to take FAVOR ................. 18 -%- <br />property at fair market value for OPPQSE................20% <br />redevelopment purposes? (WAIT FOR STRONGLY OPPOSE ....... 42% <br />RESPONSE) Do you feel strongly DON'T KNQW/REFUSRD.__14-%- <br />that way? <br />The City of Mounds View is considering future residential road <br />reconstruction projects. There would be an assessment cost for <br />impacted property owners, spread over a ten, -year period, of <br />approximately $2,500 to $3,000 per household, in addition to a <br />general city-wide ta,x increase. <br />16- Would you favor or Oppose a road STR0NGJ,Y FAVOR.— .....11% <br />,reconstruction, project in your PAVOR.................19-% <br />area? (WAIT FOR RESPONSE) Do you OPPOSE ................21% <br />feel strongly that way? STRONGLY OPPOSE....... 40% <br />DON'T KNOW/REFUSED .... .9% <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.