My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 2018/03/05
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2018
>
Agenda Packets - 2018/03/05
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:46:46 PM
Creation date
6/13/2018 11:20:48 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
3/5/2018
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
3/5/2018
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
115
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
04/07/2005 10:37 6129201069 DECISION RESOURCES PAGE 05 <br />17. For road reconstruction, would you CONCRETE.. ............601 <br />prefer CONCRETE curb and gutter OR BITUMINOUS ............ 11% <br />BITUMINOUS -- ASPHALT -- curb and NO PREFERENCE ......... <br />12% <br />gutter, if the cost to residents NEITHER................9% <br />were about same' DON'T KNOW/REFUSED.....7�; <br />18. Do you feel the City is too tough, TOO TOUGH..............3% <br />about right or not tough enough. in ABOUT RIGHT ........... 58%, <br />enforcing the City Code on such NOT TOUGH ENOUGH...... 33% <br />nuisances as junk cars, messy DON'T KNOW/REFUSED.....7& <br />yards, weeds or tall grass, and <br />outside storage? <br />IF "TOO TOUGH" OR "NOT TOUGH ENOUGH," ASK: (N=143) <br />19. Why do you feel that way? <br />UNSURE, 1 ; MESSY YARDS, 20, JUNK CARS, 28-W; RUN- <br />DOWN HOUSES, 9�; TOO STRICT/LEAVE OWNERS ATONE, 80; <br />HOMES WITH MULTIPLE CODE VIOLA`PIONS, 13b; NEED TOUGH <br />CONSEQUENCES, 9°s; TALL GRASS .AND WEEDS, 3%-; SCAT- <br />TERED, 1� <br />20. Would you favor Or oppose the City STRONGLY FAVOR ........ 25%- <br />passing an ordinance that would FAVOR.................25% <br />limit the number of vehicles OPPOSE..... .......18% <br />parked on a residential lot? (WAIT STRONGLY OPPOSE ....... 23!� <br />FOR RESPONSE) Do you feel strongly DON'T MOW/REFUSED ..... 9%- <br />that why? <br />Moving on.... <br />21. Would you favor or appose an, in- FAVOR..................421; <br />crease in the city portion of your OPPOSE .......... .....46%, <br />property taxes if cost -of -living DON'T KNOW/REFUSED....13%- <br />tax increases were needed to main- <br />tain services at their current: <br />level? <br />22. Would you favor or oppose a reduc- FAVOR.................28%r <br />tion in city services if the city- OPPOSE.. ..........55� <br />portion of your property taxes can DON'T KNOW/REFUSRD _ .17W <br />be reduced? <br />IF "FAVOR," ASK: (N=113) <br />23. What services would you be willing to see cut to keep <br />your property taxes from increasing or to reduce your <br />property taxes? <br />UNSURE, 48%-; NONE, 11$; ACROSS THE BOARD, 3�; PARKS <br />AND RECREATION, 7%,; ADMINISTRATION, 9�; STREETS, 3$; <br />POLICE, 7W; SNOW REMOVAL, 9%; GOLF COURSE, 3W; <br />SCATTERED, 1-t. <br />4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.