My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 2017/08/21
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2017
>
Agenda Packets - 2017/08/21
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:49:37 PM
Creation date
6/13/2018 3:36:35 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
8/21/2017
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
8/21/2017
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
92
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Item 03 <br />August 21, 2017 <br />Page 3 <br /> <br />The survey additionally asked residents what they would specifically like or dislike on this <br />site (open question). Answers varied greatly. Often, what one person wanted, another did <br />not. <br /> <br />A common theme to the Bonestroo and Stantec studies is mixed-use. Referring to the <br />development proposals, mixed use is proposed by Global and INH. INH’s proposal is <br />specific to an indoor shooting range. Global’s three proposals (Option 1, 2, 3) are not <br />tenant specific. Options 1 & 3 include mixed use buildings with residential over retail. <br />Global has stated that if they are not able to fill retail space, it may be converted into <br />residential. <br /> <br />City Staff has discussed with Ramsey County access to the site. The County’s Access <br />Management Policy recommends that driveways be setback a minimum of 660’ from an <br />intersection. The south end of the property is about 500’ from the Co Rd H2 intersection <br />with Mounds View Blvd, thus, it is unlikely that an access would be approved onto Mounds <br />View Blvd. Access is likely to come from Edgewood Dr, and Co Rd H2. This has been <br />communicated with the three developers, none of which have responded that the limited <br />access would substantially change their proposals. However, it will affect the type and <br />amount of retail/office. <br /> <br />In comparing the three developer’s proposals to the Bonestroo and Stantec studies, it <br />should be understood that the developers did not have the same benefit of time. Thus, the <br />proposals do not include the same level of detail for landscaping, public amenities, and <br />exterior materials compared to the two studies. If Councilmembers have expectations for <br />specific amenities or appearances, the Council should express that to the chosen <br />developer so that it may be incorporated into the next design phase. <br /> <br />The anticipated development process is as follows: <br /> <br />Fall 2017: City enters into predevelopment agreement with Developer. <br />Fall/Winter 2017: Developer applies to re-zone property from B-3 to R-4 or <br />Residential PUD if all residential, or to Mixed Use-PUD if <br />residential/retail. <br />Winter 2017: Developer applies for Preliminary Plat and Development <br />Review. <br />Winter/Spring 2017: Developer applies for TIF, if applicable. <br />Spring/Summer 2018: Developer applies for Final Plat. Greenfield Ave is vacated. <br />Property is sold by City to Developer. <br />Fall 2018: Utilities are moved, construction begins. <br />Fall/Winter 2019: Construction completed. <br /> <br />LAND VALUE <br />Attached, please find a chart showing: (1) assessed land values and City’s acquisition <br />costs, (2) price scale per sq ft of land/buildings, and (3) comparable land values. <br /> <br />The City purchased these properties (3.81 acres/165,963.6 sq ft excluding ROW) and <br />demolished three buildings for the equivalent cost of $10.86 p/sq ft ($1.8 million). The <br />second graphic on the attached chart shows a variable cost of $1 - $7 p/sq ft ($166,000 - <br />$1.1 million). If the City Council vacates Greenfield Ave, this would add approximately
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.