My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 1999/04/05
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1999
>
Agenda Packets - 1999/04/05
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:47:16 PM
Creation date
6/14/2018 4:58:11 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
4/5/1999
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
4/5/1999
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
166
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
impacted directly or indirectly as we have tried to match skills with needs, and that all of the <br /> employees who left went on to better positions including Ms. Weitzel. <br /> Some specifics to note in the job description include acting as the administrator in the <br /> administrator's absence, acting as an in-house legal coordinator with hopes of reducing our city <br /> attorney costs, acting as a more direct coordinator of city clerking functions being the <br /> management of city actions and documents, acting in a coordinating manner for the <br /> dissemination of city business information, and taking on higher leadership expectations. <br /> Another aspect of some of the changes to note is that will Tracy Sanchez having left, her <br /> replacement will work directly and essentially learn the position responsibilities from Cari. <br /> Some additional work will be needed in the future, specifically during a future comparable worth <br /> pointing evaluation. I do not think it is necessary to go through a full pointing evaluation at this <br /> time. In looking at a few other cities, it appears that assistants range between the high 400s to <br /> the upper 600s. I think a more practical concern would be to view the going rate for other <br /> positions and assign a compensation Mounds View can afford. It so happens two other <br /> communities are looking for assistants currently and I think being relative to the Roseville <br /> position is more in line with Mounds View's abilities. I propose simply adding 5%to the top of <br /> the assistant to the city administrator position with step increases following at additional 5% <br /> increments. Included in your packet is the current 1999 pay plan. Ms. Schmidt is scheduled to <br /> go to step 5 in her current position this month. <br /> Assistant City Administrator Compensation Range (proposed) <br /> Step 1 Step 2 Step 3 Step 4 Step 5 <br /> 48,798 51,357 54,060 56.905 59,900 <br /> I would propose starting Schmidt at Step 1 the first full pay period after council approval and <br /> moving to Step 2 at the first of 2000 with annual adjustments thereafter. The adjustment for the <br /> increase in the 1999 budget would be made from contingency funds, essentially the difference <br /> between Step 1 of this position versus Step 5 of her current position proportionate to the remainder <br /> of this year. If council agrees to this change, a resolution will be drafted adopting the new position <br /> and the accompanying compensation changes. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.