Laserfiche WebLink
comments, they are on the agenda for discussion. John Hammerschmidt will be present. Council <br /> has received John's report from the last meeting on the truck purchase. As far as the billboard signs, <br /> little has been done since we last talked but we can bring it up again. <br /> Item 9 -Building Inspections Agreement: Cari and Nyle have completed the draft of the building <br /> inspections agreement and will present it to the Council Monday evening. <br /> Item 10 - Building N: This item was delayed for action in order to have the EDC review and <br /> comment. Council can do the same Monday evening. <br /> Item 11 -Assistant City Administrator Position Reclassification: Council can refer to my memo <br /> on this subject. <br /> Item 12: Aiport Update: A couple of things need to be noted with our airport efforts. First, I met <br /> two weeks ago with MAC staff and the Circle Pines administrator to go over a sound abatement <br /> council in regards to our legislation. We will be meeting with MAC again later this month. I need <br /> to review a few considerations with the Council on this in order to carry this discussion on. Our <br /> legislative efforts call for a system wide abatement council which helps keep a unified interest in <br /> dealing with MAC amongst the participating communities, certainly something that is helping our <br /> legislative efforts to date. The reality though may be that ultimately we will have only real interest <br /> in noise problems at our airport. Our legislative efforts have dropped this requirement, but it may <br /> be prudent to keep the regional option on the table in our discussions. As for Mounds View's <br /> involvement,I would like to know from the Council who and how many local residents do you think <br /> should be involved, whether concerns exist about the efficacy of the committee (I have mine) and <br /> anything else. I included in your packet a report Cari put together for St. Louis Park on the MSP <br /> abatement council that may give some insight to options to consider. <br /> Next, our bill passed the senate Local Government Affairs committee Wednesday. Senator Novak <br /> did a great job responding to committee questions and MAC retorts. The vote was 9 to 5. Now the <br /> bills are heading to the floors of each house and additional work will be needed. We met after the <br /> committee meeting and suggest a number of things be done. First, encourage council members and <br /> anyone you can find to call Novak's office at 651-296-4334 or E-mail at <br /> sen.steve.novak@senate.leg.state.mn.us and thank him for his efforts and then ask what he would <br /> like you to do next to help get it through the senate. We think the number of calls helped, and we <br /> think we will need another effort for the next stage. Second,plan on attending and inviting everyone <br /> you can think of to a house leadership town meeting here in Mounds View in the council chambers, <br /> April 14 at 7 p.m(I have to check this time). Speaker Sviggum and Majority Leader Pawlenty will <br /> be here with Barbara Haake to review the house's work to date. They will need to see and hear the <br /> interest of Mounds View residents on this issue. This bill can still be stopped, so this is a serious <br /> opportunity to get the message to house leadership. Third, anyone you know with connections to <br /> anyone at the legislature should contact them and ask for their support. Remember that most of the <br /> members from around the state either don't care or know about this issue and have to be given a <br /> reason to vote for it. The argument that the legislature is the appropriate body for deciding on the <br /> definitions of metropolitan airports,not the unelected MAC and Met Council is striking home with <br /> people. I also agreed to extend Chris Georgecas' work lobbying with Bob Long at the capital. I will <br />