Laserfiche WebLink
pirquismararmmarmitraratrarisrairarararisarm ; <br /> productivity,and profitability in your company, but will expose the company and you to class-action lawsuits, <br /> possible loss of coverage from insurance companies,malpractice for professionals,and director and officer <br /> liability--a grand slam!" <br /> Several states have passed laws to protect private business and state agencies from just that kind of legal <br /> action related to the Y2K problem. Despite those efforts,and despite the fact that the Year 2000 problem is a <br /> technical problem with a technical solution,your city or county attorney should be aware of legal risks. <br /> On the Technical Side <br /> Solving the Year 2000 problem is not technically difficult,even for embedded microchips. <br /> There are five recognized solutions to the Year 2000 problem: <br /> Conversion:The only fix that is a complete and permanent solution is also the most obvious: convert <br /> every date to a four-digit year,following International Standard Organization ISO 8601,adopted by <br /> the American National Standards Institute(ANSI),which calls for all dates to be entered as "yyyy <br /> mmdd." March 31, 1998 would be entered and stored as 1998-03-31. This approach offers a com- <br /> plete, permanent fix that will change all data records and every application using them. It is also <br /> the most intuitive fix. But it requires extensive program and file conversions. Every program in an <br /> application must be checked for significant data use and converted;then the entire application has <br /> to be converted from its previous form to its new form all at once. Existing data must <br /> also be converted all at once. This includes all active,archived,and security files. <br /> This approach will also demand a significant amount of new storage space,roughly <br /> a 7-percent increase. It will take the most time and is the most costly. <br /> Fixed Windowing:Creating a 100-year window such as 1936 and 2036 can give com- <br /> puters and software a way to decide which century is appropriate for a date. If the <br /> two-digit year is greater than 36,say 47 or 99,then the program assumes the century <br /> digits to be 19;if the two-year digit is less than or equal to 36,the century digits are <br /> assumed to be 20. This approach requires no change in data,but it provides only a temporary fix. At <br /> best,it buys some time. It works only until its appointed time runs out,and at that point it will require <br /> reprogramming. <br /> Sliding Windowing:This is like fixed windowing,with one significant difference. The 100-year <br /> window is calculated from the current date. Each year the software using sliding windows will <br /> adjust(slide)the 100-year window one year forward. This approach requires no changes in data, <br /> only in date processing routines,and the same code can be used for many years. Production <br /> programs,for most applications,can be gradually converted, and they can adapt year after year <br /> without reprogramming. If the 100-year window is well-selected,it may be permanent and cheaper <br /> than ISO 8601. Thus,sliding windowing offers many local governments the fastest,most reliable, <br /> and least costly way of dealing with the Y2K problem. <br /> Y2K <br /> YOU <br /> -5- Q Q*s g m ®1°"'_ <br />