Laserfiche WebLink
January 8, 1998 <br /> Mr. Chuck Whiting <br /> City Administrator <br /> City of Mounds View <br /> Mounds View,Minnesota <br /> RE: Mounds View Community Center <br /> Bel-Rae Ballroom <br /> Alternates <br /> Project #90634 <br /> FAX TRASMITTAL <br /> Dear Chuck: <br /> With respect to the above referenced project the following items are presented for your information. <br /> At the City Council meeting on December 15, 1997,it was indicated that the budget forthe o lpr <br /> fixed at the$4 million level(Phase 1 of the project cost was approximately9 <br /> existing building was to be included in this amount. Should the cost of the projectx the total project was <br /> amount,bid alternates would be included to allow the City to choose which $ 00,000). The cost to reroof the <br /> project. items would beed included e in the <br /> Preliminary cost quotations for the project were prepared by Flannery <br /> Managers)for the building based on the Design Development documents. Thep preliminary <br /> project over budget. (project Construction <br /> p maty costs showed the <br /> After a review of the cost quotations and the documents,a number of proposed items were <br /> adjusted,redefined or were eliminated. These changes did not affect the program or the <br /> work for the project. evaluated, <br /> original scope of <br /> However,even with these revisions the project appears to be slightly over budget byapproximately <br /> $120,000. These costs appear to be related to additional site work that was indicated in <br /> the project. These costs were not budgeted for due to the late delivery of the report. The <br /> epotwas <br /> by WAI in April 1997,with delivery in June 1997. The report was finallypd and delivered in <br /> completed the Soils Report for <br /> September 1997, he report requested <br /> Per WAI Meeting Minutes,April 21, 1997,any soil correction dollars required have not <br /> project. The Soils Report indicates that soil correction is required, including but not limited <br /> existing fill and topsoil and compacting new fill for foundation and floors,soil fill been tion added r the <br /> pavement areas, water removal during site grading and footing construction and additional to: excavatinggthicke <br /> due to soil condition, and compaction for <br /> paving thickness <br /> Upon receipt and review of the cost quotation, the exact extent of the soil correction <br /> The budget for the project was capped at the$4 million level. Since this cost does not reflect <br /> correction dollars, additional cost reductions are required to maintain the construction dollarsug is now apparent. <br /> the soils <br /> In an attempt to keep the project on budget the following budget. <br /> been prepared for the City's review. These items will inuded design elementsst alternates ar note <br /> included in the base bid contract, but will be listed as additive or deductive elements to <br /> base bid,allowing each itemized costs to be compared and if o that are <br /> desired construction cost. the <br /> possible, selected to reach the <br />