Laserfiche WebLink
Ericson stated that the applicant has requested, as an accessory to the principal rental operation, <br /> they be allowed to sell rental vehicles from the site as well. He explained that this type of <br /> accessory use is allowed in this district, so long as it does not encompass more than thirty percent <br /> of the gross floor area of the business, which, in this case would translate to three vehicles. He <br /> stated that both the resolution before the Council and that approved by the Planning Commission <br /> contain the limitation that no more than three vehicles on the lot be for sale at one time. <br /> Ericson stated, at the Planning Commission level,there was some question regarding signage. <br /> He stated the applicant had requested permanent signage to advertise vehicles for sale, and that <br /> staff and the Planning Commission had recommended against that, given that auto sales have <br /> their own specific set of criteria and zoning considerations. He stated that this site could not <br /> accommodate a use strictly for the sale of automobiles, and therefore, it was believed that any <br /> type of advertising would go against the grain of the Zoning Code. He stated that it was <br /> determined that any exterior signage would not be allowed. He stated that signage within a <br /> vehicle would be allowed. <br /> Ericson stated that the conditional use permit requirements for this particular use,had been reviewed <br /> by staff and the Planning Commission, and all of these requirements have been met and satisfied. <br /> He added the general requirements,which are present with any conditional use permit have also been <br /> met to the satisfaction of the Code. <br /> Ericson stated the applicant has indicated his desire to upgrade the landscaping on the site. He stated <br /> the City Forester was at the site that date, and had recommended that some additional plantings <br /> could be installed, however, in regard to the untended plantings already on site, he recommended <br /> that they might be trimmed back and cared for,rather than removed. Ericson stated that there were <br /> no specific requirements in regard to landscaping, other than those of the conditional use permit, <br /> which indicate that they upgrade it to the satisfaction of staff and the City Forester. <br /> Ericson provided an overview of the stipulations associated with this particular use. These include <br /> the hours of operation,the issue of signage and the number of vehicles on the lot for sale at any time. <br /> In addition,no more than twenty-three vehicles will be allowed on the site pursuant to the revised <br /> site plan, the service of vehicles will be limited to those vehicles owned by the business, and the <br /> applicant will make the recommended landscaping improvements. Ericson stated that, as with the <br /> previous request,the conditional use permit shall be recorded with Ramsey County. He stated that <br /> Page 5 of the resolution, contains a second clause which states all other conditional use permits on <br /> file with the subject property pertaining to previous uses shall be"revoked,rescinded and considered <br /> null and void," as the provisions pertaining to those uses are no longer being observed. <br /> Ericson stated that the Planning Commission heard this request at their July 7 and July 21 <br /> meetings. He stated after some discussion concerning the use, and the potential impacts to the <br /> neighborhood, they approved a resolution recommending to the City Council that this <br /> conditional use permit request be approved,with stipulations that have been carried forward into <br /> the Council resolution. <br /> 7C:\ADMIN\MINUTES\CC\072699CC.MIN <br />