My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 1999/08/23
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1999
>
Agenda Packets - 1999/08/23
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:49:38 PM
Creation date
6/14/2018 6:43:51 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
8/23/1999
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
8/23/1999
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
231
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Skeate CUP Request <br /> 2809 Woodale Drive <br /> August 23, 1999 <br /> Page 2 <br /> property line and 5.5 feet from the east property line. The total square footage of the garage and <br /> proposed addition is 1,296 square feet, which would comprise about 16 percent of the rear yard <br /> area. The maximum coverage allowed is 20 percent. <br /> Adverse Effects <br /> The City Code, in Section 1125.01, Subd. 1 states that the possible adverse effects of a <br /> conditional use permit request shall be considered prior to making a decision. The following <br /> represent those items explicitly stated in the Code: <br /> 1. Relationship with the Comprehensive Plan. <br /> The Comprehensive Plan encourages the development and maintenance of residential <br /> areas so as to improve the quality, appearance and attractiveness of housing units and <br /> residential property in general. The Comprehensive Plan designates this property, 2809 <br /> Woodale Drive, as high-density residential. The existing use is not compatible with the <br /> land use designation, yet this will be corrected with the updated comprehensive plan. <br /> Garages and other types of accessory structures like sheds and tool buildings are allowed <br /> and expected in this district, yet a garage that is triple the size of the house may be <br /> inconsistent with the second residential goal, which states: "Preserve the identity and <br /> improve the quality and appearance of existing residential neighborhoods." Staff feels that <br /> this proposal would not improve the quality and appearance of the neighborhood. <br /> 2. The Geographical Area Involved. <br /> 4. The Character of the Surrounding Area <br /> In this area of Mounds View, most of the lots are as large or larger than the subject <br /> property. There is a good mix of architecture present in the neighborhood, with some of <br /> the houses being older and some newer. The subject home, however, is much smaller than <br /> those in the immediate area. Many homes in this area have large garages yet they do not <br /> appear out of place because the houses are larger as well. While a larger garage could be <br /> accommodated on the subject property, it would not be proportionally consistent with the <br /> house. <br /> 3. Whether such use will tend to or actually depreciate the area in which it is proposed. <br /> It can be generally assumed that adding to the existing garage would have a positive <br /> impact on the value of the subject property. It is not known whether a garage three times <br /> larger than the home would have a negative monetary impact upon the neighborhood, <br /> even though it may be visually obtrusive. <br /> 5. The demonstrated need for such a use. <br /> The existing 720 square-foot garage is considered typical by today's standards. While it does <br /> not have access for three vehicles, there is ample work area and storage space beyond that <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.