Laserfiche WebLink
• 47a Pdasbury Center <br /> Kennedy 200 South sixth sn+eet <br /> Minneapolis MN 55402 <br /> �f (612)337.9300 tdephonc <br /> 1 rat en I (G12) 37-931o'Eas <br /> o-dnadl:arr {Denney-grdvez.ama <br /> • CHARTERED <br /> • <br /> • <br /> Starr.1.RIGGS <br /> Marcy st L*. <br /> plied OW(6121337-9264 <br /> January 5, 1998 <br /> • <br /> VIA <br /> Ms. Lynette Morgan 1rAC5IMIt.E <br /> Assistant to the City Administrator Q�1`cz <br /> k- <br /> City of Mounds Viewalk,5' 0-4 <br /> 2401 <br /> Highway I O r�,� r <br /> 4an? <br /> Mounds View. MN 55112-1499 5,e �j lcc7 • <br /> o 1 v <br /> RE: Personnel Policy Review Initial Comments ,,� ,o` u.:.. <br /> Our Pile No.: M1J210-18 �n ri � <br /> Dear Ms. Morgan: <br /> • <br /> Pursuant to out conversation last week regarding this matter, please find following my initial <br /> comments as to my review of the draft personnel policy for the City of Mounds View. My <br /> comments are in addition to those previously provided to you by Mr.John M.LeFevre,Jr. of our <br /> office. Both sets of comments are provided as a means to initiating discussion as to the draft <br /> pommy.. <br /> As to general comments forthis matter.please note that at this point in time I have reviewed the <br /> draft policy as to general concepts and issues rather than as a proof reader. However.please note <br /> that there appear to be a few typographical errors in the draft policy which should be removed <br /> upon a final proof reading of the policy. <br /> As to specific provisions contained in the draft policy,please note first off that I concur with the <br /> suggestions and issues raised by Mr. LeFevre. All four of the specific matters raised should be <br /> clarified in the further revisions of the draft policy. My other specific comments are as follows: <br /> 1. In Section 1.30 of the.draft policy, reference to Minn. Stat, § 13.03 should contain s. <br /> caveat that the list of "public" data is not exhaustive and ' o'.. <br /> 2. , Section 3.10 of the draft policy, it may be more appropriate to reference the statutory <br /> holidays (see Minn. Stat. § 645.44, subd. 5) as it appears that the City has included an <br /> extra holidayzg those listed. <br /> 3. In keeping with the "employment-at-will" notion for the draft policy, Section 4.25 should <br /> 57R13b071 <br /> Mt2210-L8 <br />