Laserfiche WebLink
there. Not only are several of the issues brought up dependent upon each other, many <br /> conflict with each other as well. The City appears to need a land use plan to settle on the <br /> character of the area and establish criteria for consideration of any of these types of <br /> development in the future. The comprehensive plan is also being finished off at this time <br /> and may lend some clarity to the favored use in the area, but I would suggest the Council <br /> contemplate bringing in an outside consultant to review the area, confer with residents <br /> and city boards and develop a plan for community review. I think this would be a more <br /> tenable approach than having the various interests established within the City <br /> organization battle it out. If the Council sees this as a viable approach, I can work to <br /> bring something back to the Council at a later date for review. <br /> John will be present in this discussion for the related reason that looking at possible <br /> improvements to the golf course could enhance the revenue stream for the course. <br /> Whether that should supersede other land use options is precisely the reason for my <br /> statements above, but nonetheless the status of the golf course remains an issue. Since <br /> the last meeting, John has faced some additional circumstances that can be reviewed at <br /> the meeting. <br /> Item 4 - Golf Course Funding Options: I reviewed the discussion of Monday afternoon <br /> with Jim O'Meara on interfund loan options and this discussion will give more time to <br /> that. I am making an assumption that the further from the general fund (and the tax levy) <br /> such a loan can be, the better. O'Meara's report that some of the City's tax increment <br /> can be reviewed for conditions that could place a portion of the funds outside the <br /> restrictions of TIF use make this an option to consider. Again, there is no free lunch. <br /> Pursuing this avenue will require review of plans for future use of TIF funds, which the <br /> Council has contemplated throughout the year and which also is the subject of Item 9. <br /> Item 5 - Review of Televised Council Meetings Policy: The Cable Television <br /> Committee will have representatives here Monday evening to respond to the Council <br /> interest in policies for televising meetings. A draft of their policy is in your packet. <br /> Item 6 - Review of Video Presentation Options for Council Chambers: Bruce <br /> mentioned in his reports this past Monday that consideration is being given to replacing <br /> the overhead projector in favor of something else. The Cable Television Committee has <br /> also reviewed this and will discuss with the Council Monday. <br /> Item 7- Review of I-35W Corridor Coalition Status and Upcoming Met Council <br /> Joint Meeting: As I mentioned at the meeting Monday, the Met Council will be meeting <br /> with the City Councils from the I-35W Corridor Coalition October 6, and hopefully all <br /> Mounds View Council members can attend that meeting. Some background is in order <br /> therefore for you and Rick has put together a summary of the effort and we can discuss it <br /> further during the work session. <br /> Item 8 - Streetlight Request, 7666 Knollwood Drive: Jim Ericson will cover this item. <br />