Laserfiche WebLink
I should also let the Council know that since the meeting where the direction was given to <br /> develop an information request form, I have received a standard form that complies with <br /> Minnesota data practices statutes. It is used in some surrounding communities as well. <br /> While the form itself is complete, part of the foim delineates the type of data determined <br /> being requested. According to data practices, some types of data are either not <br /> considered public such as personal social security numbers, while other data cannot be <br /> made public unless compiled so as not to infringe on privacy rights. For instance, the <br /> City may become aware of someone's income due to a social service program that assists <br /> in paying water bills. We can say we have X% of bill payers receiving assistance,just <br /> not name the people individually. Anyway, I need to have a policy in place that <br /> employees can use to determine the type of information to be made available. This <br /> shouldn't be too hard since I have copies of other cities policies as well, it's just a little <br /> cumbersome in doing it timely. I expect we will have it done fairly soon. <br /> In other matters, we have had some discussion about the City Hall parking lot striping. It <br /> wasn't done quite right. The stalls are a few inches too narrow. Mike conferred with me <br /> about the options to correct it. To do something sounds like a bigger mess than leaving it <br /> as is, and that is how staff is leaving it with the contractor. The lot will eventually get <br /> seal coated and we can restripe it properly. Related, questions have been coming to us as <br /> to whether the double yellow line on Edgewood means left turns cannot be made into the <br /> parking area. The final word here is that the yellow lines do not prevent that turn from <br /> being made; cars simply can't pass there. It was designed correctly. <br /> In our staff meeting of Tuesday, we reviewed the meeting of Monday night. I reported <br /> on Givonna Reed coming as the new Assistant and my expectations of her. We discussed <br /> the need to increase and improve the information we have on the City proper and City <br /> operations, that that should help provide staff, council and residents a better reference <br /> point from which to decide what's good for the community. Specifically this boils down <br /> to two general areas, one, from the community development perspective the GIS data that <br /> is becoming available must be analyzed and presented for public consumption. It is <br /> expected that with improvements to our web page and internal computer filing that it can <br /> be more complete and easier to access for everybody. This would include property <br /> values, land uses, zoning identification and so forth. The second need we discussed is to <br /> do a better job at measuring City operations and productivity. It has been difficult <br /> sticking to this objective with the volume of stuff taking place,but the increased use of <br /> software should be getting us into a position to scrutinize our own productivity better. <br /> We also discussed the need to acknowledge that data does not substitute for values, <br /> meaning needs will still be determine as policy. We spent the rest of the meeting on the <br /> agenda for Monday's work session. We have some absences to work around this month <br /> as well. <br /> That's it for now. Have a good weekend and see you on Monday. <br />