My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 1999/09/27
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1999
>
Agenda Packets - 1999/09/27
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:50:13 PM
Creation date
6/14/2018 7:00:12 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
9/27/1999
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
9/27/1999
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
94
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council August 23, 1999 <br /> Regular Meeting Page 34 <br /> Council Member Stigney stated he disagreed. He stated this was a public forum, he was a public <br /> Council Member, and this was the discussion for determining whether or not a position is <br /> necessary, and the type of person being considered. <br /> Mayor Coughlin stated that this was very nearly approaching a personnel matter. <br /> Council Member Stigney stated he was discussing whether or not a City Administrator function <br /> requires an assistant, and if so, what other methods of staffing might be able to handle it. He <br /> added if there were none, they should consider an intern position. <br /> Mayor Coughlin commented that Ms. Reed, contrary to what was indicated, would not only be <br /> taking a pay cut, but would have to enter into her third year of employment with the City of <br /> Mounds View to attain what she is currently earning. He stated she would not be coming into <br /> the City and immediately earning a high salary. He explained that Ms. Reed would actually be <br /> earning less than former Assistant to the City Administrator Schmidt did in the same position, <br /> which represents a savings to the City. <br /> Council Member Marty inquired regarding the term and salary of Step 1. <br /> City Administrator Whiting stated this was typically a six month term, and the salary is five <br /> percent lower than the stated Step 2. <br /> Council Member Marty stated, therefore, they would be starting Ms. Reed at the six-month <br /> period. He commented that if she were in this for the money, she would not accept this job and <br /> take a pay cut. He stated this proposal would obtain someone for the City with a Masters Degree <br /> in Public Administration, and accelerate her pay level by six months. <br /> Council Member Stigney stated this would add another the burden to the taxpayers of the City, <br /> which he does not feel is justified. He stated that if someone is needed, they should be looking at <br /> a different person to fill this position. He stated he had provided options of how to do this. He <br /> stated an individual who indicates they want to get some experience to move on is the wrong <br /> candidate. He reiterated that an intern or a restructuring of the secretarial position would be <br /> appropriate. <br /> Mayor Coughlin stated he would not want to "invest in stock for gold watches" for any <br /> government employee whether with the City of Minneapolis or Mounds View. <br /> Council Member Stigney stated they have a City Administrator, and are not hiring someone to <br /> run the City. He stated they were hiring someone who assists in running the City. <br /> Council Member Thomason stated Council Member Stigney had brought forward some valid <br /> concerns. She stated in regard to someone coming in and using the system in order to get their <br /> "feet wet, " having been in management and a supervisor for approximately 20 years, that is the <br /> name of the game, and is why you would accept a position. She stated the average length of <br /> employment of a person coming in to a position is approximately three years, because they do <br /> want to gain experience and then move on. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.