My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-13-1999 CC
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1999
>
09-13-1999 CC
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:50:01 PM
Creation date
6/14/2018 7:27:44 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
9/13/1999
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
9/13/1999
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
107
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council August 23, 1999 <br /> Regular Meeting Page 4 <br /> Mayor Coughlin stated the Director of Public Works and the Ramsey County crews have been <br /> working on Spring Lake Road and County Road I, and he had received telephone calls, and been <br /> approached by residents who extended their gratitude to the County and the City for a job well done. <br /> He stated the project was still in the final stages of completion, however, as it develops,people have <br /> indicated to him that they are very excited to have received the road they desired, and are pleased <br /> with its appearance. He stated he would like to publicly acknowledge that the County workers on <br /> that site are"top notch." He stated he had the opportunity to speak with the foreman at the site,who <br /> worked the crews most diligently. He stated they should be commended for their good work. <br /> Council Member Stigney reported he had attended the Planning Commission meeting,of August 18, <br /> and that Items A, B, and C, presently set for public hearings had been considered at that meeting. <br /> He stated that one of these items was the consideration and unanimous vote of the Planning <br /> Commission to deny a conditional use permit for an oversized garage at 2801 Woodale Drive. He <br /> stated another item was the request by MSP Real Estate for the assisted living senior residential <br /> facility, which was approved. He stated the third item was the consideration of the wetland <br /> alteration permit for Edgewood Square, which was unanimously denied. <br /> City Administrator Whiting reported he had attended the League of Minnesota Cities Board meeting <br /> the prior week, where he underwent his orientation with that body. <br /> City Administrator Whiting stated he had received an interesting telephone call from an individual <br /> who stated the traffic volume on Highway 10 had lessened since the US Highway 10 has gone <br /> around the community. City Administrator Whiting stated he would be interested in hearing from <br /> more people, who feel this is the case, and what this might mean, in terms of the development and <br /> community issues along Highway 10. <br /> Mayor Coughlin stated he had received similar comments, and that he had noticed less traffic <br /> volume on the City's stretch of Highway 10, as well. He stated he had also noticed an increase of <br /> traffic on Highway 118,many times over that,which was just a few weeks prior,a fairly vacant road. <br /> City Administrator Whiting stated he believed this matter merited community discussion, as it <br /> changes the character of the highway and with that, some of the land use planning may require <br /> review. Mayor Coughlin stated he would be interested in attempting to facilitate this discussion with <br /> the property owners and businesses that are adjacent to the City's section of Highway 10. He stated <br /> the Comprehensive Plan was to be reviewed at the planning level, and these matters could be <br /> revisited. He stated there was a limited window of opportunity, during which the state is giving the <br /> County back the road. He stated if they wanted to do something differently with the road and the <br /> way it is developed, they should have some input prior to the state or county stepping in and redoing <br /> it. He explained that, after investing a major amount of capital on the road, the state or county might <br /> be very resistant to changing it. <br /> 4C:\ADM IN\MINUTES\CC\8-23-99.CC <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.