Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View City Council August 23, 1999 <br /> Regular Meeting Page 35 <br /> technical services of him. He stated they could hire someone at a lower pay grade just to do "busy" <br /> work. <br /> Mayor Coughlin noted that with Option 3, Planning Associate Ericson would be designated as <br /> Planner and Neighborhood Liaison. He stated it has been the focus of the Council, and himself <br /> personally, to provide more dialogue with the people on specific issues. He stated it would be of <br /> benefit to have a person with the personality and knowledge to work with the community. He stated <br /> he had been contacted by numerous Planning Commissioners who provided unsolicited kudos and <br /> praises to Jim Ericson, for his professionalism and competence in this area. He stated he was in <br /> favor of honoring an employee who was doing excellent work, with compensation that reflects that. <br /> Council Member Marty stated he agreed with this. He stated that Planning Associate Ericson did <br /> possess very good public demeanor. He stated he was outgoing, and could relate to people. <br /> Community Development Director Jopke stated Planning Associate Ericson was an excellent <br /> employee, who should be rewarded for his efforts. <br /> City Administrator Whiting expressed his appreciation to Community Development Director Jopke <br /> for taking it upon himself to delve into what is considered a personnel matter. He stated typically, <br /> they would have someone in personnel administration conducting some of this research. He stated <br /> he would like the Council to understand that this represents an issue, which would resurface again <br /> and again, as it had in the past. He stated that regardless of the policies or choices of the Council, <br /> in regard to determining a salary plan or a comparative basis for employee salaries, the reality was <br /> that Community Development Director Jopke has had to do this research. He added that he had also <br /> been involved in this discussion to some extent. <br /> City Administrator Whiting stated the reality of this situation is that staff thinks Jim Ericson is an <br /> excellent employee, and they would like to provide some type of future for him with the City of <br /> Mounds View. He stated there would be no reason to consider this proposal, if that were not the <br /> case. He stated he believed there was an opportunity presented to further develop an employee who <br /> the City has already invested in, and to structure a position for someone who is yet to be determined, <br /> to come into the City, and perhaps start their career or continue it. <br /> City Administrator Whiting stated during his three and a half years with the City,he had seen people <br /> come and go. He stated these are people the City has invested in, and people they may choose to <br /> further invest in to the City's advantage, as well as their own, due to their work skills and abilities. <br /> He stated he did not believe there was a formula that could be arrived at which would allow this to <br /> happen in a manner that would be acceptable for every situation. He stated when staff comes to the <br /> City Council regarding personnel and personnel changes, they are knowledgeable regarding the <br /> issues. He stated in this case in particular, he felt strongly that proposal should be approved. He <br /> stated he was fully confident, that with the reconstruction of these positions, they would not only <br /> being doing something good for Jim Ericson, but also for the Department, and for the City. He <br /> stated if this was not the case, the proposal would not have been presented. <br /> 35C:\ADMIN\MINUTES\CC\8-23-99.CC <br />