My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 1999/09/13
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1999
>
Agenda Packets - 1999/09/13
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:50:01 PM
Creation date
6/14/2018 7:27:44 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
9/13/1999
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
9/13/1999
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
107
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council August 23, 1999 <br /> Regular Meeting Page 36 <br /> Council Member Marty stated he thought Jim Ericson had much ability and knowledge that he <br /> would like to see the City take advantage of, rather than spending his time on menial tasks. He <br /> stated he thought this was a good time to reevaluate these positions, as they are presented. He stated <br /> Planning Associate Ericson had indicated that he and the former Housing Inspector in their <br /> respective positions,were inspecting the same houses and properties, and could not understand why <br /> this was necessary, however, that was what each of their job descriptions called for. He stated this <br /> was a duplication of job services, and a waste of time and manpower. He stated this proposal was <br /> a creative effort on the part of Community Development Director Jopke and his staff, to attempt to <br /> streamline their department, and make it more efficient. He stated he would also like to commend <br /> Community Development Director Jopke for his efforts. <br /> Community Development Director Jopke thanked Council Member Marty for his comment. He <br /> stated their intention was to do things in an efficient and effective manner, and he believed this <br /> proposal would assist in that goal. <br /> Council Member Stigney stated he had no problem with the concept being presented,regarding how <br /> they wanted to merge their staff to do the jobs, and he would prefer they did not even talk about <br /> specific individuals in this regard. He stated he was referring to the factors they were utilizing to <br /> establish a salary range, a Stanton Survey, based upon population. He stated the information <br /> indicated, after one year, the new salary would be $4,504, however, there would be additional 3 <br /> percent increases during that time. <br /> Council Member Stigney inquired when the City would begin to look at how much these things were <br /> costing. He stated it was his understanding that the largest cost to the City taxpayers was the cost <br /> of City employees and their benefits,yet everything that he had seen indicated the City was spending <br /> more and more. He stated he thought government should be researching ways to reduce costs. <br /> City Administrator Whiting stated he agreed with Council Member Stigney in his comment that this <br /> discussion of these matters should be separated from the individuals being considered for the <br /> positions. He stated the points Council Member Stigney made were in regard to the policy of how <br /> to establish a pay plan. He stated he did not disagree with this. He stated they had entertained this <br /> discussion numerous times, and it was actually included within the budget discussion as personnel <br /> costs,personnel, and staff assessment. He stated, however, they were going to have to make some <br /> judgments as to how to proceed. He stated he would like to have a system in place, which would <br /> make these types of discussions moot. He stated no matter what system they utilize, it would not <br /> be so broad or all encompassing to allow them to deal with all of the specific situations they face, <br /> and the opportunities they are presented with. <br /> City Administrator Whiting stated, in regard to Cari Schmidt's position, and presently with Jim <br /> Ericson's position,these proposals were mindful of the persons performing the job, and attempting <br /> to structure the positions to take advantage of the employee's skills. He stated that many City <br /> employees are never provided this opportunity,primarily because of the nature of their position, not <br /> their abilities. He stated this was a good opportunity to rectify this situation. He stated Council <br /> 36C:\ADMIN\MINUTES\CC\8-23-99.CC <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.