My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 1999/11/22
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1999
>
Agenda Packets - 1999/11/22
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:51:10 PM
Creation date
6/14/2018 7:58:19 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
11/22/1999
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
11/22/1999
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
107
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council <br /> November 15, 1999 <br /> Regular Meeting <br /> Page 25 <br /> amount of time the Planning Commission spent on this item, both in terms of the development <br /> review and the conditional use permit, staff recommends approval of this proposal. He stated <br /> staff has drafted Resolution 5385, which approves the development review for MSP Real Estate <br /> to construct their project as indicated in the plans, if Council so desires. <br /> Planning Associate Ericson stated the resolution contains a stipulation that the applicant install <br /> signage along County Road I, to indicate "right in, right out"access at this point. He explained it <br /> was hoped this would eliminate any vehicles from attempting to cross lanes of westbound traffic, <br /> to access the property at this location. He pointed out that if in the future, it appears there are <br /> some issues with the access the matter will be revisited. He explained that the other stipulation is <br /> that the building signage will be in compliance with the City Code and the approved conditional <br /> use permit. <br /> The applicant was present. <br /> MOTION/SECOND: Quick/Thomason. To Approve Resolution 5385, a Resolution Approving <br /> a Development Review for a Two-story, 46-Room Senior Assisted Residential Facility Located <br /> at 2670 County Road I; Planning Case No. 573-99. <br /> Council Member Marty inquired if the light standards were subject to a 20-foot limit, which <br /> issue had come forward during consideration of the Theater Project lighting. <br /> Planning Associate Ericson advised there is no limit on the height of a light standard. He <br /> explained that the Theater Project was subject to this requirement, because it was stipulated in <br /> the Planned Unit Development document. <br /> Ayes—5 Nays—0 <br /> Y Motion carried. <br /> E. Consideration of Resolution 5386, a Resolution Approving a Wetland Buffer <br /> Permit for Spencer Mistelske, 2442 Laport Drive. <br /> Planning Associate Ericson stated the applicant was before the Council to request a Wetland <br /> Buffer Permit. He stated at the October 25 City Council meeting, the Council agreed to <br /> authorize a Limited Use Agreement for the applicant to construct a driveway over the <br /> unimproved right-of-way on Laport Drive. He explained at that time, the delineation indicated <br /> the house and the proposed driveway would be a significant distance from the wetland and there <br /> would be no encroachment into the 100-foot buffer setback. He stated however, when the <br /> applicant and the contractor went out the site to conduct further research, they realized there <br /> were a number of significant trees in the proposed path of the driveway. He explained that the <br /> applicant would prefer not to remove the trees, which is likely the City's preference as well. <br /> Planning Associate Ericson stated the applicant has drafted a plan that would allow for <br /> construction of the driveway, and avoid the removal of any of the large and significant trees, <br /> however, this plan would involve an encroachment into the 100-foot setback by approximately <br /> 10 feet. He provided the Council with the Certificate of Survey, which indicates the proposed <br /> placement of the driveway. He pointed out that the driveway could still be installed without <br /> encroaching upon the buffer, however, staff believes, in terms of saving the trees, it might be <br /> appropriate to allow for the 10-foot encroachment. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.